Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366473
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT |
| Date | 2016-08-24 10:01 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <npk9ch$slt$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <91a59199-7d5b-49cc-9aaf-1905d7f44e73@googlegroups.com> <npi8kj0kiu@news3.newsguy.com> |
On 8/23/2016 3:36 PM, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:52:29 -0700, Takuya Saitoh wrote: > >> >> Linux users always lagging in new hardware support behind the Windoze/Appil, >> > > Fuck you, bonehead. > > The fault is ALWAYS the hardware manufacturers who will not make > their precious specifications freely available. Damn right they're precious. Do you not understand how capitalism works? Besides which, not long ago you were calling for FOSS developers to not make Windows ports. > But in those cases where specs are freely available, such as > many plug-in audio cards, the GNU/Linux drivers are far superior > to any Microshit/Apphole counterparts. blah blah blah. Which cards, which drivers? (now slink away after another one of your 'pronouncements') > Obtaining specifications are only half of the battle. The other > half is writing quality code to make full use of the hardware > potential. GNU/Linux programmers can far surpass their commercial > cousins in this regard. A very few can. A very, very, very few. Hobby idealism is far less motivating than money, of course. Which is why you've never created and made available any FOSS programs. But put a $100 bill on the end of a fishing line and you'll chase it 'til you drop.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 08:52 -0700
Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:15 +0000
Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-08-23 13:09 -0400
Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-23 19:30 +0200
Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-23 13:27 -0500
Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 14:29 -0400
Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:14 -0400
Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-08-23 23:00 +0100
Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:23 -0400
Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-23 19:36 +0000
Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 18:07 -0700
Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:35 -0400
Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 15:41 +0200
Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 11:00 -0400
Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:01 -0400
Re: The (near)future of computer networks: Li-Fi + IoT Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:18 -0400
csiph-web