Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #50283
| From | Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: the IS-A function |
| Date | 2016-08-20 20:35 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <npa4ds$6gp$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <810b8836-ef38-45c6-849e-60a281485f3c@googlegroups.com> <b149c08f-7d72-40d7-ac86-7193eb0d4c7b@googlegroups.com> <53168bfe-8dcd-46cb-9fa1-cc369b9b9db9@googlegroups.com> <87pop4to9x.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <062906a4-6b6b-4017-9d8b-02ca93bab295@googlegroups.com> |
On 20/08/2016 20:29, franck.bensusan@gmail.com wrote: > My definition (well, not only mine I think) is that a server offers > services to clients (hence it's name...). > It can offer database, files, Web HTTP, services, printing, email, ... Precisely. I run a mail "server" off a broken laptop. It works perfectly for that task. > After that, if you want to buy a server to make your computations (or 3D > rendering), of course you can, and you can go to 100% CPU load, > no problem with that... But you don't use it as a server. Again, precisely. One of my clients had purchased 64-core servers and was very concerned about making sure as many cores as possible were operating as much as possible at 100%. That client was interested in super-low-latency processing, not serving up services.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-15 23:10 -0700
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-16 00:22 -0700
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-16 14:01 -0700
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-16 14:20 -0700
Re: the IS-A function JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2016-08-17 05:04 -0700
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-17 10:52 -0700
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-17 19:31 -0700
Re: the IS-A function anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-18 08:00 +0000
Re: the IS-A function JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2016-08-18 21:52 -0700
Re: the IS-A function Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 07:11 -0700
Re: the IS-A function franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2016-08-17 23:13 -0700
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 11:59 -0700
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 15:11 -0700
Re: the IS-A function franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 23:14 -0700
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 01:01 -0700
Re: the IS-A function franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 03:14 -0700
Re: the IS-A function Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 13:31 +0300
Re: the IS-A function Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 03:39 -0700
Re: the IS-A function franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 06:49 -0700
Re: the IS-A function lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 14:55 -0700
Re: the IS-A function Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-19 14:57 -0700
Re: the IS-A function franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2016-08-20 10:29 -0700
Re: the IS-A function Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 20:35 +0300
Re: the IS-A function Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-20 10:53 -0700
Re: the IS-A function Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 11:01 -0700
Re: the IS-A function Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-20 19:36 -0700
Re: the IS-A function Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 20:15 -0700
Re: the IS-A function lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-08-21 14:53 -0700
Re: the IS-A function Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-08-19 08:28 -0500
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-20 19:30 -0700
Re: the IS-A function Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-08-20 22:20 -0500
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-20 20:50 -0700
OOP (was: the IS-A function) Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 07:21 +0300
Re: the IS-A function Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 01:42 -0700
Re: the IS-A function Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 14:16 +0200
Re: the IS-A function Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 11:08 -0700
Re: the IS-A function Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 21:25 +0200
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-21 12:01 -0700
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 17:08 -0700
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 00:29 -0700
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-28 11:01 -0700
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-28 14:45 -0700
Re: the IS-A function Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 02:22 -0700
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 12:02 -0700
Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 18:31 -0700
csiph-web