Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #50259

Re: the IS-A function

From Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: the IS-A function
Date 2016-08-19 14:57 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <87pop4to9x.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <51226078-dad2-4319-a37e-5f5c388aeed7@googlegroups.com> <84edde73-1b5d-4fc8-8395-d463d48f1437@googlegroups.com> <810b8836-ef38-45c6-849e-60a281485f3c@googlegroups.com> <b149c08f-7d72-40d7-ac86-7193eb0d4c7b@googlegroups.com> <53168bfe-8dcd-46cb-9fa1-cc369b9b9db9@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


lawrencedo99@gmail.com writes:
> I agree laptops can’t handle this, but desktops and servers can.

Yes, that's basically the point of a server.  There are some cheap
hosting companies (Hetzner etc.) building servers out of desktop
hardware.  I've had some doubts about that (non-ECC memory etc) but I've
had some and in fact have run long 24/7 computations on them.  My next
one will probably use actual server hardware though--it now costs just a
few percent more.

My laptop on the other hand used to actually start smelling bad
(adhesives inside heating up or something) if you ran something cpu
intensive for longer than a few minutes.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-15 23:10 -0700
  Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-16 00:22 -0700
  Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-16 14:01 -0700
  Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-16 14:20 -0700
    Re: the IS-A function JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2016-08-17 05:04 -0700
      Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-17 10:52 -0700
        Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-17 19:31 -0700
      Re: the IS-A function anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-08-18 08:00 +0000
        Re: the IS-A function JennyB <jennybrien@googlemail.com> - 2016-08-18 21:52 -0700
    Re: the IS-A function Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 07:11 -0700
    Re: the IS-A function franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2016-08-17 23:13 -0700
      Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 11:59 -0700
        Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 15:11 -0700
          Re: the IS-A function franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 23:14 -0700
            Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 01:01 -0700
              Re: the IS-A function franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 03:14 -0700
                Re: the IS-A function Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 13:31 +0300
                Re: the IS-A function Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 03:39 -0700
                Re: the IS-A function franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 06:49 -0700
                Re: the IS-A function lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 14:55 -0700
                Re: the IS-A function Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-19 14:57 -0700
                Re: the IS-A function franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2016-08-20 10:29 -0700
                Re: the IS-A function Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 20:35 +0300
                Re: the IS-A function Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-20 10:53 -0700
                Re: the IS-A function Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 11:01 -0700
                Re: the IS-A function Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-20 19:36 -0700
                Re: the IS-A function Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 20:15 -0700
                Re: the IS-A function lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-08-21 14:53 -0700
              Re: the IS-A function Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-08-19 08:28 -0500
                Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-20 19:30 -0700
                Re: the IS-A function Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-08-20 22:20 -0500
                Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-20 20:50 -0700
                OOP (was: the IS-A function) Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 07:21 +0300
                Re: the IS-A function Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 01:42 -0700
                Re: the IS-A function Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 14:16 +0200
                Re: the IS-A function Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 11:08 -0700
                Re: the IS-A function Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 21:25 +0200
                Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-21 12:01 -0700
      Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 17:08 -0700
        Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 00:29 -0700
          Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-28 11:01 -0700
            Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-28 14:45 -0700
    Re: the IS-A function Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 02:22 -0700
      Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 12:02 -0700
      Re: the IS-A function hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 18:31 -0700

csiph-web