Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.development > #9761
| From | "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.development |
| Subject | Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... |
| Date | 2016-07-24 19:54 +0200 |
| Organization | KESYS-development |
| Message-ID | <nn2vmj$1mhk$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <nmttk2$17sb$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nn2o8h$v9j$1@dont-email.me> |
James Harris replied: ... >> when I boot from an IDE-connected drive and use BIOS calls like >> int11/12/14/17 (rather old and useless today anyway) I see much more >> PCI-devices (EHCI-USB, onboard SOUND and Bridges) than what I see if I >> boot from an SATA-drive with only a few BIOS calls >> (int15_e820,int10_0003,int13_4xxx). >> the BIOS hide or just disable some PCI devices on the type of boot >> device? or is this any other BIOS function I havent seen so far ? >> I can of course setup the (known by AMD southbridge docs) PCI-regs to >> reenable all expected PCI-devices, but why does BIOS disable it ? >> checked with and without USBtoPS/2 mouse-emulation yet, equal result. __ > So, when you boot from IDE BIOS tells you one story but when you boot from > SATA BIOS tells you a different story about connected devices? the BIOS disables some USB hosts (regardless of connected things) and a few other devices too when I boot from SATA drive. > First thought: Don't use the BIOS if you can avoid it. We know different > BIOSes have different bugs. If you can detect what you need by hardware > probing then you should be safer. checked on another machine with different BIOS and a newer AMD-chipset ... same story. > Walking the PCI bus (and other busses connected thereto) should enumerate > everything, shouldn't it, on any PC made in the last 20 years or so? > Before that there was PnP which would also allow enumeration. Yes, but its hard to enumerate a device that dont show up. perhaps thats why windoze need a lot of 'drivers' from mainboard vendor and several reboot cycles to make all these unseen work. > That said, some chipsets may require special bits to be set in registers > or they will hide some of their hardware. Is that the problem you are > facing? Exact. I suspect that the BIOS modify too many southbridge bits for SATA. I hoped there were known BIOS-functions to overrule this behaviour... Meanwhile I have to run my whole PCI-scan one more time after chip-type recognition and device enabling. __ wolfgang
Back to alt.os.development | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-07-22 21:53 +0200
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 16:52 +0100
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-07-24 19:54 +0200
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 07:07 +0100
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-07-25 11:04 +0200
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 10:30 +0100
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-07-25 14:06 +0200
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 13:16 +0100
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-07-26 13:09 +0200
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 15:14 +0100
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfrze.cam> - 2016-07-25 21:55 -0400
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-07-26 12:48 +0200
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfrze.cam> - 2016-07-26 08:18 -0400
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-07-26 20:11 +0200
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-07-28 18:53 +0200
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-07-29 19:47 +0200
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@zxdehrnyya.cam> - 2016-07-29 17:44 -0400
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-07-30 09:44 +0200
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 12:55 +0100
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-07-30 19:40 +0200
Re: PCI-enum and SouthBridge behaviour... James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 19:08 +0100
csiph-web