Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #49243

Re: Jazelle?

From "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Jazelle?
Date 2016-07-20 14:33 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nmo232$n6f$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <nmn4gf$p1o$2@news.albasani.net> <MPG.31f93e8b429c8383989804@172.16.0.1> <nmnge0$rri$1@dont-email.me> <578f5616$0$297$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <nmnvn3$env$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 wrote:

> "Doug Hoffman" <glidedog@gmail.com> wrote in message news:578f5616$0$297$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
> > On 7/20/16 5:31 AM, gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 wrote:
> > > Consider the solution of the quadratic equation expressed in a HLL
> > > 
> > > X = (-B + SQRT ( B**2 - 4*A*C))?2*A
> > > 
> > > ... then consider what you have to do in Forth to achieve the same
> > > end. of pushing variables onto the stack and manipulating that stack
> > > to realise that Forth is, indeed, assembly language!
> > 
> > The above reminds me of the debates we used to have (mid 1970s) about
> > RPN vs algebraic pocket calculators.
> > 
> > With algebraic one had to use and keep track of parentheses and remember
> > operator precedence rules. Yes, RPN at first feels unnatural, but with a
> > little practice it became the preferred method for many of us.
> 
> But this is not aboput a calculator; it is about a computer program laid out on paper,
> and one in which the syntax checking of the HLL compiler will root out mismatched
> parentheses in a way that no sytax checking in Forth would root out, for example,
> an extra DUP inserted into the assembly-like code.

A good editor will help with matching parentheses.

It is probable that most Forth fanatics belong in one of these
categories:

1. Those who cannot see the truth.
2. Those who refuse to see the truth.

They don't appreciate ease of programming and the reduction of bugs.

-- 
The report card by the American Society of Civil Engineers showed the national
infrastructure a single grade above failure, a step from declining to the point
where everyday things simply stop working the way people expect them to. ---
washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/us-infrastructure-gets-d-in-annual-report/2013/03/19/c48cb010-900b-11e2-9cfd-36d6c9b5d7ad_story.html

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-20 10:31 +0100
  Re: Jazelle? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-20 10:14 +0000
    Re: Jazelle? Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 05:37 -0700
      Re: Jazelle? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-20 13:36 +0000
    Re: Jazelle? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-20 13:06 +0000
    Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-20 14:49 +0100
      Re: Jazelle? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-20 08:48 -0700
      Re: Jazelle? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-20 14:35 +0000
        Re: Jazelle? mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2016-07-20 17:39 +0100
        Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-20 20:30 +0100
          Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 15:35 -0400
            Re: Jazelle? mhx@iae.nl - 2016-07-20 13:27 -0700
              Re: Jazelle? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-21 09:41 +0000
            Re: Jazelle? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:24 -0700
        Re: Jazelle? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-21 10:43 +0000
          Re: Jazelle? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-21 12:44 +0000
            Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-21 22:59 +0100
              Re: Jazelle? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-22 06:42 +0000
                Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-22 12:03 +0100
                Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 09:05 -0400
                Re: Jazelle? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-22 10:09 -0500
                Re: Jazelle? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-07-22 19:20 +0300
                Re: Jazelle? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 09:35 -0700
          Re: Jazelle? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-25 10:43 +0000
            Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-26 11:41 +0100
              Re: Jazelle? Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 04:26 -0700
                Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 11:20 -0400
  Re: Jazelle? Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 06:44 -0400
    Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-20 14:52 +0100
      Re: Jazelle? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-20 14:33 +0000
      Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 10:52 -0400
        Re: Jazelle? alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-07-20 15:40 +0000
          Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 11:46 -0400
          Re: Jazelle? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-20 09:25 -0700
    Re: Jazelle? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-20 09:22 -0700
      Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 13:14 -0400
        Re: Jazelle? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-20 21:44 -0700
          Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 01:32 -0400
            Re: Jazelle? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-21 02:21 -0500
          Re: Jazelle? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 17:13 -0700
            Re: Jazelle? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-21 17:42 -0700
            Re: Jazelle? humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 10:08 -0700
              Re: Jazelle? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-07-23 13:55 -0700
                Re: Jazelle? humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 02:22 -0700
  Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 10:56 -0400
  Re: Jazelle? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 10:54 -0700
    Re: Jazelle? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-20 13:33 -0500
      Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 16:51 -0400
        Re: Jazelle? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-20 17:09 -0500
          Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 18:12 -0400
            Re: Jazelle? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-07-20 18:41 -0500
              Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 21:01 -0400

csiph-web