Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #90488

Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation

From BartC <bc@freeuk.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation
Date 2016-07-17 22:19 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nmgspp$e2t$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <53ccbf4e-2d12-4d86-9af1-9062ff002f9c@googlegroups.com> <ecc6e5ec-a0a9-44ee-bf44-f55c9f583c98@googlegroups.com> <nmgmr4$po8$1@dont-email.me> <58b93c00-e82e-4f1a-b337-9746bcdf6187@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 17/07/2016 21:44, Aaditya Kalsi wrote:
> On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 3:38:20 PM UTC-4, Bart wrote:

>> I tested using the 'binary tree' benchmark. The version I used is here:
>> http://pastebin.com/9FA3J76b (I lost my native C version; this is
>> auto-generated C.)

> Would you mind if I added the treebin code as a reference performance test in the suite I maintain?

You can do but there are better versions in 'proper' C. Here's a couple:

http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/program.php?test=binarytrees&lang=gcc&id=5

http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/program.php?test=binarytrees&lang=gcc&id=1

(These take input N from the command line.)

-- 
Bartc

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Feedback for a malloc implementation Aaditya Kalsi <aadityakalsi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 17:45 -0700
  Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Udyant Wig <udyant.wig@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 12:22 +0530
    Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Udyant Wig <udyant.wig@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 17:58 +0530
      Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-17 13:40 +0100
        Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Udyant Wig <udyant.wig@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 23:06 +0530
          Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Aaditya Kalsi <aadityakalsi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 13:40 -0700
  Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-17 00:30 -0700
    Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-17 10:54 +0100
      Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Aaditya Kalsi <aadityakalsi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 04:36 -0700
    Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Aaditya Kalsi <aadityakalsi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 04:31 -0700
      Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-17 11:40 -0700
        Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Aaditya Kalsi <aadityakalsi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 13:41 -0700
  Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Aaditya Kalsi <aadityakalsi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 07:02 -0700
    Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-17 20:38 +0100
      Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Aaditya Kalsi <aadityakalsi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 13:44 -0700
        Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-17 22:19 +0100
          Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Aaditya Kalsi <aadityakalsi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 18:08 -0700
    Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-18 09:40 -0700
      Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Aaditya Kalsi <aadityakalsi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 10:48 -0700
        Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-20 08:45 -0700
          Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-20 09:28 -0700
            Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-07-21 18:25 -0700
              Re: Feedback for a malloc implementation Aaditya Kalsi <aadityakalsi@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 16:52 -0700

csiph-web