Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox
Date	2016-07-15 07:13 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nmak0g$qpi$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<9e22233b-04d1-466a-b501-4f7e77303bae@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/14/2016 6:42 PM, Pentcho Valev wrote:
> Special relativity's prediction that either twin ages more slowly than the other (as judged
> from the other twin's system) leads to absurdity unless "enough strangeness occurs during
> the turning-around period to make A end up older". However, during the turning-around period,
> the traveling twin is very far away from his stationary brother so the idea that "enough
> strangeness" is somehow produced during the turning-around period and this "enough strangeness"
> miraculously affects the distant stationary twin is simply idiotic.

Being very far away prevents strangeness?

>
> Pentcho Valev



-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-14 16:42 -0700
  Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-14 17:18 -0700
    Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 20:54 -0700
    Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 06:04 +0200
      Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-14 21:25 -0700
        Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 06:36 +0200
          Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-14 21:42 -0700
            Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 06:48 +0200
            Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 06:52 +0200
              Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-14 21:58 -0700
                Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 07:01 +0200
                Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 07:07 +0200
                Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-14 22:56 -0700
            Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 07:22 -0500
        Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 07:19 -0500
    Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 06:40 +0200
    Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 07:00 +0200
    Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 07:14 -0500
  Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-15 05:05 -0700
  Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 07:13 -0500

csiph-web