Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox

From	Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox
Date	2016-07-15 06:36 +0200
Organization	Good company
Message-ID	<nm9p7j$k06$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<9e22233b-04d1-466a-b501-4f7e77303bae@googlegroups.com> <ab9f943b-4972-4c9d-a65c-67e03108e8d1@googlegroups.com> <nm9ncf$ept$1@dont-email.me> <88f6813c-11d3-4d46-9c7e-cb8f8f0be458@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Dne 15/07/2016 v 06:25 mapou001@gmail.com napsal(a):
> On Thursday, July 14, 2016 at 9:04:33 PM UTC-7, Poutnik Fornntp wrote:
>> Dne 15/07/2016 v 02:18 mapou001@gmail.com napsal(a):
>>
>>>
>>> The very word "relativity" invalidates Einstein's physics because it assumes instantaneous communication at a distance, something that is forbidden by the theory.
>>>
>> It does not assume instantaneous communication.
>> You are misinformed.
>>
>> -- 
>> Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )
>> Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
> 
> You are the one who is misinformed. Get some knowledge so you can be humble, goddammit. LOL

Well, such a comment
invalidates your seriousness for scientific purposes.
> 
> Relative motion means knowing the velocity of one object relative to another. It cannot be done without having access to both objects at the same time regardless of distance.
> 
No, it does not mean that.
Physics is not math and nobody says you know exact values.

BTW, you say the classical physics is invalid as well,
as relative motion is here more for 4 centuries.

In fact, nobody measured other than relative speed.

-- 
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )
Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

Thread

Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-14 16:42 -0700
  Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-14 17:18 -0700
    Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 20:54 -0700
    Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 06:04 +0200
      Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-14 21:25 -0700
        Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 06:36 +0200
          Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-14 21:42 -0700
            Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 06:48 +0200
            Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 06:52 +0200
              Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-14 21:58 -0700
                Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 07:01 +0200
                Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 07:07 +0200
                Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-14 22:56 -0700
            Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 07:22 -0500
        Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 07:19 -0500
    Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 06:40 +0200
    Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 07:00 +0200
    Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 07:14 -0500
  Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-15 05:05 -0700
  Re: Absurdity Called Einstein's Twin Paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 07:13 -0500

csiph-web