Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #387470

Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification

Show all headers | View raw

JanPB wrote:

> On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 1:11:06 PM UTC-7, Jack Chardy wrote:
>> JanPB wrote:
>> 
>> > On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 11:51:45 AM UTC-7, Alejandro Bellucci
>> > wrote:
>> >> JanPB wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 9:33:56 AM UTC-7, Pentcho Valev
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2016/07/07/grand-
>> >> unification-may-be-a-dead-end-for-physics/
>> >> >>  Ethan Siegel: "Grand Unification May Be A Dead-End For Physics"
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Einsteinians' problem is different: If the quest for unification
>> >> >> continues, Einstein's spacetime, the idiotic consequence of
>> >> >> Einstein's 1905 false constant-speed-of-light postulate, will be
>> >> >> getting more and more exposed and vulnerable:
>> >> > 
>> >> > Except this is how all physics theories have ever evolved. Again,
>> >> > you are setting up a false problem: you take a general aspect of
>> >> > physics and how it develops in general, and shoehorn it into a
>> >> > ludicrous box labelled "and this is the problem of relativity".
>> >> > 
>> >> > I noticed you are back spamming sci.math after I pointed out you
>> >> > neglected that aspect of your obnoxious benhaviour. They are all
>> >> > marked as "spam" there (not by me, BTW).
>> >> 
>> >> It rather looks like indistinguishable that you don't understand
>> >> what he says
>> > 
>> > Oh I understand it all right. He's been posting the same exact stuff
>> > (
>> > 
>> > I post my followups to his nonsense just for entertainment. It's like
>> > a nice glass of wine after dinner :-)
>> 
>> Ohh, you are an alcoholic too, no wonder people don't understand
>> tensors.
> 
> Let me guess, you are an American?

Well, bottled wine is essentially colored sulphide. Worse than the 
alcohol. Do a research.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-07 09:33 -0700
  Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 12:06 -0700
    Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 22:46 -0700
    Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Alejandro Bellucci <alejb@yahoo.info> - 2016-07-08 18:51 +0000
      Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 12:28 -0700
        Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Jack Chardy <jackc@outlool.org> - 2016-07-08 20:11 +0000
          Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 15:20 -0500
            Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Jack Chardy <jackc@outlool.org> - 2016-07-08 20:45 +0000
          Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 13:21 -0700
            Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Jack Chardy <jackc@outlool.org> - 2016-07-08 20:28 +0000
      Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 17:31 -0700
  Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-07 23:40 -0700
  Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-08 02:05 -0700
    Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-09 05:41 -0700
      Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-11 04:16 -0700

csiph-web