Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #387466
| From | Jack Chardy <jackc@outlool.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification |
| Date | 2016-07-08 20:11 +0000 |
| Organization | Wickmayer |
| Message-ID | <nlp1cl$cog$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <9498e3ed-d706-408e-9eb1-8712d93d2990@googlegroups.com> <c225d14b-1bd6-45cf-9999-3a794eedbb1b@googlegroups.com> <nlosns$5m3$2@gioia.aioe.org> <44283151-cf03-401f-ad6e-a8a2be967955@googlegroups.com> |
JanPB wrote: > On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 11:51:45 AM UTC-7, Alejandro Bellucci wrote: >> JanPB wrote: >> >> > On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 9:33:56 AM UTC-7, Pentcho Valev wrote: >> >> http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2016/07/07/grand- >> unification-may-be-a-dead-end-for-physics/ >> >> Ethan Siegel: "Grand Unification May Be A Dead-End For Physics" >> >> >> >> Einsteinians' problem is different: If the quest for unification >> >> continues, Einstein's spacetime, the idiotic consequence of >> >> Einstein's 1905 false constant-speed-of-light postulate, will be >> >> getting more and more exposed and vulnerable: >> > >> > Except this is how all physics theories have ever evolved. Again, you >> > are setting up a false problem: you take a general aspect of physics >> > and how it develops in general, and shoehorn it into a ludicrous box >> > labelled "and this is the problem of relativity". >> > >> > I noticed you are back spamming sci.math after I pointed out you >> > neglected that aspect of your obnoxious benhaviour. They are all >> > marked as "spam" there (not by me, BTW). >> >> It rather looks like indistinguishable that you don't understand what >> he says > > Oh I understand it all right. He's been posting the same exact stuff ( > > I post my followups to his nonsense just for entertainment. It's like a > nice glass of wine after dinner :-) Ohh, you are an alcoholic too, no wonder people don't understand tensors.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-07 09:33 -0700
Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 12:06 -0700
Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 22:46 -0700
Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Alejandro Bellucci <alejb@yahoo.info> - 2016-07-08 18:51 +0000
Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 12:28 -0700
Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Jack Chardy <jackc@outlool.org> - 2016-07-08 20:11 +0000
Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 15:20 -0500
Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Jack Chardy <jackc@outlool.org> - 2016-07-08 20:45 +0000
Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 13:21 -0700
Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Jack Chardy <jackc@outlool.org> - 2016-07-08 20:28 +0000
Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 17:31 -0700
Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-07 23:40 -0700
Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-08 02:05 -0700
Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-09 05:41 -0700
Re: Einsteinians May Abandon Grand Unification Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-11 04:16 -0700
csiph-web