Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #559544
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy |
| Date | 2016-03-05 06:58 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nlcqqc-uuf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <kfmpqc-8pd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <377ae881-f05c-491e-8195-5ff481ae11d6@googlegroups.com> <5n0qqc-tqe.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <nbdogr$1tst$1@gioia.aioe.org> <83da0def-e2cc-4739-8bf3-4923780539ef@googlegroups.com> |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 8:49:39 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote: >> On 3/4/2016 9:34 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> sounds like all he really has is a set of one liners he likes to use, >> about 7, and that is about it. >> >> nothing else of any substance or value, nada, zip. >> Except for those extreme self-wacko films on Youtube, demented! Worth >> showing at a frat party > > > Do you think that if you had a substantive dispute with my thinking > that you would be less obsessed with me. It isn't obsession, it is that you are one hell of a comedy act. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why the science of clouds is still cloudy Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 15:53 -0800
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 00:39 +0000
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 16:50 -0800
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 03:34 +0000
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-04 22:48 -0600
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 20:52 -0800
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 06:58 +0000
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 06:25 -0800
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 19:11 +0000
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:34 -0800
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 22:11 +0000
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-05 13:07 -0800
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 19:01 -0600
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 16:52 -0800
csiph-web