Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #559499
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy |
| Date | 2016-03-04 22:48 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nbdogr$1tst$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <5ba0414c-8698-4e6a-9b0b-a6350e653f57@googlegroups.com> <kfmpqc-8pd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <377ae881-f05c-491e-8195-5ff481ae11d6@googlegroups.com> <5n0qqc-tqe.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
On 3/4/2016 9:34 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 4:46:06 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Why the science of clouds is still cloudy >>> >>> It is not to anyone except you and a few other kooks. >> >> Why are you so frustrated all the time? > > You are projecting again; I'm not frustrated, I'm laughing at you. > > sounds like all he really has is a set of one liners he likes to use, about 7, and that is about it. nothing else of any substance or value, nada, zip. Except for those extreme self-wacko films on Youtube, demented! Worth showing at a frat party
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why the science of clouds is still cloudy Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 15:53 -0800
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 00:39 +0000
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 16:50 -0800
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 03:34 +0000
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-04 22:48 -0600
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 20:52 -0800
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 06:58 +0000
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 06:25 -0800
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 19:11 +0000
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:34 -0800
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 22:11 +0000
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-05 13:07 -0800
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 19:01 -0600
Re: Why the science of clouds is still cloudy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 16:52 -0800
csiph-web