Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #89687

Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB

From "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB
Date 2016-06-20 20:32 -0700
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <nkacfr$16dk$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <nk3503$7v0$1@dont-email.me> <be950b83-2eab-48aa-9616-ccc2174bf61c@googlegroups.com> <nk46d0$3oa$1@dont-email.me> <nk488q$94m$2@dont-email.me> <nk48sd$pbn$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/18/2016 12:53 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 6/18/2016 12:43 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> On 18/06/16 20:11, Bill Cunningham wrote:
>> <snip>
>>>
>>>      Truely random can't be compressed?
>>
>> Right.
>>
>>> If there's a header indicating the
>>> algorithm of randomness,  or encryption why not?
>>
>> If you can generate it via an algorithm, it isn't truly random.
>>
>
>
> Can a given, lets say, 32 bytes of truly random data exist as a sequence
> within some fractal, somewhere over the rainbow?

What about random data within a certain range? Say 0-9... So, this 
random data is in a sequence like:

[0, 3, 4, 1, 2, …]

Ahh, the symbols are confined to 0-9, surely some sort of compression 
can most likely be applied because we have many more symbols to work 
with on a per-byte basis? Perhaps converting to another base might be 
useful wrt using up some of those unused symbols.

;^o


Hummm... Although, I think encryption just might be able to be used to 
create an abundance of patterns, that might be compressible...

Again, this is in the context of, over the rainbow type shi%!

Is 100% total non-sense, or perhaps 99.999...%?

;^)

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 07:25 -0700
  Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB mark.bluemel@gmail.com - 2016-06-16 08:08 -0700
    Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2016-06-17 12:04 -0500
      Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-17 10:16 -0700
        Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-17 23:08 -0700
  Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-16 08:09 -0700
    Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 08:15 -0700
      Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 08:18 -0700
        Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB mark.bluemel@gmail.com - 2016-06-17 01:28 -0700
          Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-17 02:03 -0700
            Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-06-17 10:34 +0100
              Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-06-17 10:44 +0100
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-06-17 11:03 +0100
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-17 03:51 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 02:16 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 02:29 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-06-17 08:19 -0500
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 03:17 -0700
              Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 18:32 +0100
      Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-16 08:43 -0700
        Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 08:48 -0700
      Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-06-16 10:49 -0500
        Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 09:10 -0700
          Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-16 09:36 -0700
            Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-06-16 11:18 -0700
          Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-06-16 13:13 -0500
            Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 20:18 +0100
              Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-06-16 22:07 +0100
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 06:04 +0100
              Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-16 23:21 -0500
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-06-17 07:49 -0500
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-17 12:47 -0500
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-06-17 14:47 -0500
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-17 23:32 -0500
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 01:33 -0700
            Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 14:51 -0700
      Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-06-16 16:50 +0100
        Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-06-17 16:20 +0100
    Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 08:34 -0700
  Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-16 12:55 -0500
  Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-16 11:53 -0700
    Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-16 12:14 -0700
    Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-17 12:33 -0700
      Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-17 12:46 -0700
    Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 15:04 -0700
      Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-17 22:55 -0700
        Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 01:38 -0700
          Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-06-18 10:41 +0100
            Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 02:55 -0700
            Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-18 05:08 -0700
              Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-06-18 15:11 -0400
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-06-18 15:13 -0400
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 12:43 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-06-18 20:43 +0100
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-18 12:53 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-20 20:32 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-06-18 13:22 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-06-18 16:35 -0400
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-06-18 21:37 -0400
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-06-18 16:59 -0400
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2016-06-20 09:55 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-06-20 21:22 +0100
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB cris <crisdunbar@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 17:13 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-06-21 10:42 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-06-21 20:09 +0100
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2016-06-21 13:39 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-06-22 08:34 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-06-22 19:48 +0100
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-06-19 01:37 +0100
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-06-19 02:22 +0100
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-06-18 21:30 -0400
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-06-19 02:41 +0100
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-06-18 21:55 -0400
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-06-19 03:20 +0100
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 02:53 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-18 16:05 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 06:59 -0400
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 05:55 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-19 06:13 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 12:26 -0400
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-26 09:53 -0700
              Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-06-18 20:41 +0100
              Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 06:45 -0400
            Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-18 14:42 -0500
            Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB gordonb.vnsk1@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2016-06-20 01:13 -0500
              Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-06-20 12:16 -0700
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-06-20 21:27 +0200
                Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Xaltonon <xaltonon@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 21:25 -0700

csiph-web