Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB |
| Date | 2016-06-17 14:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dsj2fcFbjiqU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <dsg961ForroU1@mid.individual.net> <87porhvt5v.fsf@gmail.com> <seu6mbdenu8031pd2b33lgj1bu67jk41f6@4ax.com> <dsi9upF6h15U1@mid.individual.net> <rrd8mbth1clkutk1pohc9fm9v7fie56t6m@4ax.com> |
"Robert Wessel" wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:49:30 -0500, "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> > wrote: > >>"Robert Wessel" wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 20:18:52 +0100, Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>"Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> writes: >>>> >>>>> prove it >>>> >>>>OK. Suppose you have an algorithm that can reversibly compress any file >>>>of 1kb to 1023 bytes or fewer. >>>> >>>>There are 2^1024 files of size 1kb >>>>There are 2^1024-1 files of size 1023 bytes or fewer. >>>> >>>>Therefore you a simple count of sources and destination proves cannot >>>>uniquely map the former onto the latter. >>> >>> >>> Your confusion between bits and bytes has already been pointed out, >>> but it's customary to consider (file) sizes in bits anyway in >>> information theory. >>> >>> But yes, there are 2**1024 possible files of 1024 bits, and if you can >>> store only 1023 bits, you can only identify half of them. Usually >>> known as the "counting theorem" or the "pigeon hole principle" (you >>> can't have more pigeons than pigeon holes and hope to store all your >>> pigeons, without putting more than one in a hole). >> >>Please note that I didn't contribute anything at all on that message. > > > The "prove it" is yours, although I should have probably snipped that > that (and then the attribution). I can see why you think that. But fir responds via google which doesn't follow Usenet protocol, as a consequence my newsreader messes up attributions. In my first message (*only*) I warned of "google garble" but in the second one I did not. "Prove it" was actually an instruction from fir to me, not realizing that I had already done all the proving I was about to do.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 07:25 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB mark.bluemel@gmail.com - 2016-06-16 08:08 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2016-06-17 12:04 -0500
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-17 10:16 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-17 23:08 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-16 08:09 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 08:15 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 08:18 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB mark.bluemel@gmail.com - 2016-06-17 01:28 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-17 02:03 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-06-17 10:34 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-06-17 10:44 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-06-17 11:03 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-17 03:51 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 02:16 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 02:29 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-06-17 08:19 -0500
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 03:17 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 18:32 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-16 08:43 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 08:48 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-06-16 10:49 -0500
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 09:10 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-16 09:36 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-06-16 11:18 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-06-16 13:13 -0500
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 20:18 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-06-16 22:07 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 06:04 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-16 23:21 -0500
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-06-17 07:49 -0500
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-17 12:47 -0500
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-06-17 14:47 -0500
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-17 23:32 -0500
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 01:33 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 14:51 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-06-16 16:50 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-06-17 16:20 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 08:34 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-16 12:55 -0500
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-16 11:53 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-16 12:14 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-17 12:33 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-17 12:46 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 15:04 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-17 22:55 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 01:38 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-06-18 10:41 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 02:55 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-18 05:08 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-06-18 15:11 -0400
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-06-18 15:13 -0400
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 12:43 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-06-18 20:43 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-18 12:53 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-20 20:32 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-06-18 13:22 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-06-18 16:35 -0400
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-06-18 21:37 -0400
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-06-18 16:59 -0400
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2016-06-20 09:55 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-06-20 21:22 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB cris <crisdunbar@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 17:13 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-06-21 10:42 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-06-21 20:09 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2016-06-21 13:39 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-06-22 08:34 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-06-22 19:48 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-06-19 01:37 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-06-19 02:22 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-06-18 21:30 -0400
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-06-19 02:41 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-06-18 21:55 -0400
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-06-19 03:20 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 02:53 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-18 16:05 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 06:59 -0400
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 05:55 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-19 06:13 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 12:26 -0400
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-06-26 09:53 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-06-18 20:41 +0100
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 06:45 -0400
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-18 14:42 -0500
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB gordonb.vnsk1@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2016-06-20 01:13 -0500
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-06-20 12:16 -0700
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-06-20 21:27 +0200
Re: [sOT] compression 1 GB downto 100 MB Xaltonon <xaltonon@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 21:25 -0700
csiph-web