Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.raspberry-pi > #11728
| From | "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.raspberry-pi |
| Subject | Re: Direct digital I/O ? |
| Date | 2016-06-13 19:13 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <njmt47$ui1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <njbs2a$96b$1@dont-email.me> <njmc5g$iip$1@dont-email.me><njmf2v$kqf$1@dont-email.me> <njmnuj$uhg$1@dont-email.me> <njmp2s$dl6$1@dont-email.me> |
"Martin Gregorie" <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> wrote in message news:njmp2s$dl6$1@dont-email.me... > On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:45:05 +0100, mm0fmf wrote: > >> On 13/06/2016 15:13, Martin Gregorie wrote: >>> I suppose you realise that in a RPi >> >> He spends his life trolling in uk.r.a. and other groups Martin. > > OK, thanks. I think a plonking is in order. In 22 years of subscribing to Usenet, I have never trolled, but discuss those things that interest me. In so doing, I pick up a number of abusive ignoramuses who do not understand that which I talk about, or else blindly quote from their textbooks but without their thinking caps on. Your PP has long been in my KF for being gratuitously abusive, and his interjection quoted above fully justifies that KF presence, so it would seem. Martin, are you, too, to become a deliberately ignorant abuser, or would you prefer to stay and discuss a developing technical thread; even were that thread to move in directions in which you lack experience?
Back to comp.sys.raspberry-pi | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-09 14:47 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? GlowingBlueMist <GlowingBlueMist@blackhole.io> - 2016-06-09 11:22 -0500
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "Dave Liquorice" <allsortsnotthisbit@howhill.com> - 2016-06-09 19:56 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-10 19:55 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-10 22:27 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2016-06-11 07:45 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-11 08:37 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-11 09:41 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "Dave Liquorice" <allsortsnotthisbit@howhill.com> - 2016-06-11 11:17 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-11 14:00 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? cb@elaine.df.lth.se (Christian Brunschen) - 2016-06-11 16:12 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-12 22:00 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? cb@elaine.df.lth.se (Christian Brunschen) - 2016-06-12 22:40 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-13 11:02 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-12 22:04 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-11 13:49 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2016-06-11 09:23 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-06-11 10:47 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-11 12:46 -0400
Re: Direct digital I/O ? mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2016-06-12 09:20 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Michael J. Mahon <mjmahon@aol.com> - 2016-06-12 11:07 -0500
Re: Direct digital I/O ? andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2016-06-12 16:13 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? jeffj@panix.com (Jeff Jonas) - 2016-07-01 20:39 -0400
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-02 10:40 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-07-02 13:55 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-07-02 19:22 +0300
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-02 17:47 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-07-02 17:07 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-07-02 21:30 +0300
Re: Direct digital I/O ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-02 19:35 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-07-02 19:43 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-02 20:07 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2016-07-03 18:59 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "Ivan D. Reid" <Ivan.Reid@ivan.fsnet.co.uk> - 2016-07-03 19:15 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 14:23 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-13 14:13 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-13 15:09 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 17:48 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2016-06-13 17:45 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-13 17:04 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 19:13 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 17:47 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-13 17:49 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 19:07 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 14:25 -0400
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 19:45 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Jim H <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-13 20:14 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-14 09:38 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 19:57 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Mike Fleming <{mike}@tauzero.co.uk> - 2016-06-14 10:48 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-14 11:41 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-14 11:48 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 20:24 -0400
Re: Direct digital I/O ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-15 08:13 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 03:26 -0400
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 08:54 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? AndyW <Andy@nojunqmail.com> - 2016-06-15 16:48 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-15 21:02 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-15 11:21 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 16:21 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 08:52 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2016-06-15 18:57 +1000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 10:28 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 10:57 -0400
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 16:23 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-15 16:46 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 17:04 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> - 2016-06-15 17:43 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 20:57 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-13 17:46 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 19:06 +0100
csiph-web