Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.raspberry-pi > #11781

Re: Direct digital I/O ?

From "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject Re: Direct digital I/O ?
Date 2016-06-14 11:41 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <njon0d$lr9$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <njmc5g$iip$1@dont-email.me> <MPG.31c8f48a6c0a39f5989801@172.16.0.1> <njmtr1$g4$1@dont-email.me> <njmvm0$8us$1@dont-email.me> <dhkvlb14cq5gtjfmbe9ieo51p5tikitqm1@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw

"Mike Fleming" <{mike}@tauzero.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:dhkvlb14cq5gtjfmbe9ieo51p5tikitqm1@4ax.com...
> In article <njmvm0$8us$1@dont-email.me>, "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339"
> <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> writes:
>
>> "rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:njmtr1$g4$1@dont-email.me...
>> > I see the guy is giving you a hard time.  He really is a troll and the
>> > best thing to do is to *totally* ignore him.  Don't respond even to 
>> > tell
>> > him you are ignoring him.  I don't think that is going to happen in 
>> > this
>> > group, but it would be for the best.
>>
>> Why not put your money where your mouth is and give examples of where
>> you say that I have trolled?
>
> You have persistently trolled on uk.net.news.config and
> uk.net.news.management, where you are one of the most universally
> despised and hated posters. I see your ambition has increased.

Why not put your money where your mouth is and give examples of where
you say that I have trolled?

I note that, as before, you resort to childish outbursts in the manner of a 
5-year-old.

Shame on you.

Back to comp.sys.raspberry-pi | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Direct digital I/O  ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-09 14:47 +0100
  Re: Direct digital I/O ? GlowingBlueMist <GlowingBlueMist@blackhole.io> - 2016-06-09 11:22 -0500
  Re: Direct digital I/O  ? "Dave Liquorice" <allsortsnotthisbit@howhill.com> - 2016-06-09 19:56 +0100
    Re: Direct digital I/O  ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-10 19:55 +0100
      Re: Direct digital I/O  ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-10 22:27 +0000
        Re: Direct digital I/O  ? mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2016-06-11 07:45 +0100
          Re: Direct digital I/O  ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-11 08:37 +0000
            Re: Direct digital I/O ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-11 09:41 +0100
              Re: Direct digital I/O ? "Dave Liquorice" <allsortsnotthisbit@howhill.com> - 2016-06-11 11:17 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-11 14:00 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? cb@elaine.df.lth.se (Christian Brunschen) - 2016-06-11 16:12 +0000
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-12 22:00 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? cb@elaine.df.lth.se (Christian Brunschen) - 2016-06-12 22:40 +0000
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-13 11:02 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-12 22:04 +0100
              Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-11 13:49 +0100
            Re: Direct digital I/O  ? Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2016-06-11 09:23 +0000
              Re: Direct digital I/O  ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-06-11 10:47 +0100
            Re: Direct digital I/O  ? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-11 12:46 -0400
              Re: Direct digital I/O  ? mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2016-06-12 09:20 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? Michael J. Mahon <mjmahon@aol.com> - 2016-06-12 11:07 -0500
                Re: Direct digital I/O  ? andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2016-06-12 16:13 +0000
                Re: Direct digital I/O  ? jeffj@panix.com (Jeff Jonas) - 2016-07-01 20:39 -0400
                Re: Direct digital I/O  ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-02 10:40 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O  ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-07-02 13:55 +0000
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-07-02 19:22 +0300
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-02 17:47 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-07-02 17:07 +0000
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-07-02 21:30 +0300
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-02 19:35 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-07-02 19:43 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-02 20:07 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O  ? andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2016-07-03 18:59 +0000
                Re: Direct digital I/O  ? "Ivan D. Reid" <Ivan.Reid@ivan.fsnet.co.uk> - 2016-07-03 19:15 +0000
  Re: Direct digital I/O  ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 14:23 +0100
    Re: Direct digital I/O  ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-13 14:13 +0000
      Re: Direct digital I/O  ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-13 15:09 +0000
        Re: Direct digital I/O  ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 17:48 +0100
      Re: Direct digital I/O  ? mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2016-06-13 17:45 +0100
        Re: Direct digital I/O  ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-13 17:04 +0000
          Re: Direct digital I/O  ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 19:13 +0100
      Re: Direct digital I/O  ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 17:47 +0100
    Re: Direct digital I/O  ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-13 17:49 +0100
      Re: Direct digital I/O  ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 19:07 +0100
      Re: Direct digital I/O ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 14:25 -0400
        Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 19:45 +0100
          Re: Direct digital I/O ? Jim H <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-13 20:14 +0000
            Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-14 09:38 +0100
        Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 19:57 +0100
          Re: Direct digital I/O ? Mike Fleming <{mike}@tauzero.co.uk> - 2016-06-14 10:48 +0100
            Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-14 11:41 +0100
              Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-14 11:48 +0100
            Re: Direct digital I/O ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 20:24 -0400
              Re: Direct digital I/O ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-15 08:13 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 03:26 -0400
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 08:54 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? AndyW <Andy@nojunqmail.com> - 2016-06-15 16:48 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-15 21:02 +0000
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-15 11:21 +0000
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 16:21 +0100
              Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 08:52 +0100
              Re: Direct digital I/O ? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2016-06-15 18:57 +1000
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 10:28 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 10:57 -0400
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 16:23 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-15 16:46 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 17:04 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> - 2016-06-15 17:43 +0100
                Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 20:57 +0100
    Re: Direct digital I/O  ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-13 17:46 +0100
      Re: Direct digital I/O  ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 19:06 +0100

csiph-web