Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #24137
| From | Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 |
| Date | 2016-05-27 10:59 +0200 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <ni92a1$5rt$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <ni4tts$9h0$1@solani.org> <ni4us6$7aq$1@dont-email.me> <ni5dp8$ujk$1@dont-email.me> <ni67th$d03$1@dont-email.me> |
On 26.05.2016 09:20, David Brown wrote: > Are there any cases of incorrect code generation? > Apart from the Dhrystone Cosmic issue I didn't see any. I was surprised by the non-standard bool of Raisonance, since casts to bool behave differently than the standard. It might be a bug or intent, I didn't find any documentation on it. I didn't consider it feasible with limited time and resources to run a big test suite through the compilers to get a comparison on code correctness. We know there are some in SDCC (since it has a public bug tracker), but I have no reason to assume that the other compilers are any better or worse; they just don't publish the information. Philipp
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2016-05-25 21:20 +0200
Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2016-05-25 14:35 -0500
Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-05-25 12:39 -0700
Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-05-25 16:54 -0700
Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-05-26 09:20 +0200
Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-05-26 09:50 -0700
Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2016-05-27 10:59 +0200
Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2016-06-17 10:55 +0200
Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2016-05-26 15:22 +0200
Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2016-05-26 14:54 +0200
csiph-web