Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #24290

Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8

From Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de>
Newsgroups comp.arch.embedded
Subject Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8
Date 2016-06-17 10:55 +0200
Organization solani.org
Message-ID <nk0du9$cs$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References <ni4tts$9h0$1@solani.org> <ni4us6$7aq$1@dont-email.me> <ni5dp8$ujk$1@dont-email.me> <ni67th$d03$1@dont-email.me> <ni92a1$5rt$1@solani.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 27.05.2016 10:59, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> On 26.05.2016 09:20, David Brown wrote:
>> Are there any cases of incorrect code generation?
>>
> 
> Apart from the Dhrystone Cosmic issue I didn't see any.

It turned out that Cosmic does not do the promotion of arguments to int
on variable arguments that the standard requires. This resulted in the
Dhrystone self-test failing. I've updated the comparison accordingly.

Philipp

Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2016-05-25 21:20 +0200
  Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2016-05-25 14:35 -0500
  Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-05-25 12:39 -0700
    Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-05-25 16:54 -0700
      Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-05-26 09:20 +0200
        Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-05-26 09:50 -0700
        Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2016-05-27 10:59 +0200
          Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2016-06-17 10:55 +0200
      Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2016-05-26 15:22 +0200
    Re: A comparison of C implementations for the STM8 Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2016-05-26 14:54 +0200

csiph-web