Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #579836
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? |
| Date | 2016-05-23 17:36 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <nhvf3i$3ar$2@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <nhtdpg$1hek$1@gioia.aioe.org> <e7b1a56f-50be-4d4e-870e-411ab8b93d64@googlegroups.com> <f870f3ad-8b8d-4374-ba51-5ca5eee24466@googlegroups.com> <nhvbeo$cl6$6@gioia.aioe.org> <2d041eca-4e1e-48de-a81d-8b88d15f0f32@googlegroups.com> |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Odd >The same way they replicate the >signal of a never-before-heard >anything- like a gravitational wave? >You pull it out of your ass Nope. Scientists go through the physics and math and essentially say, "If gravity waves exist according to how General Relativity predicts, then two orbiting black holes radiatinhg gravitational waves will do *this*". (it is actually a complicated computer simulation, but it will come up with specific behavior given initial conditions). Along comes a signal that just happens to look like one of those simulations, and the scientists go back to their computers and work until they can figure out the exact initial conditions that happen to match what they saw. When they did that, they announce they found something, because they actually saw something. Similarly, a (much simpler) theory predicts antimatter is repelled by matter gravitationally. That predicts that antimatter will fall up. However, here is the difference. So far we don't have a chunk of antimatter that we can reliably observe falling up or down yet. So the situations are not the same. The answer has not come in yet for antimatter, while we do have (at least) one observation of gravitational waves. BTW when they did the gravity wave announcement, I did a web search to see what they would sound like if converted to audio. I found several - just about all of them were created long _before_ the announcement or even the observation. These are simply scientists who did the physics and computer simulations of black hole pairs, and without the help of any actual gravity wave observations. *That* is equivalent to the current state of whether antimatter falls up or not.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is antimatter anti-gravity? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-22 14:05 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 14:55 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-05-22 18:01 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 18:03 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 19:06 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 19:17 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 11:34 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 09:38 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 12:29 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-28 00:10 +0200
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 15:15 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 17:27 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-29 12:30 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 11:56 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-29 17:23 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-30 00:05 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 01:10 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 06:32 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 07:05 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 07:15 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 07:30 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-30 14:29 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-30 08:35 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 08:44 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-30 14:32 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-30 12:45 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 15:30 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 17:28 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-30 21:08 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-30 13:41 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-30 12:17 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-30 20:40 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-30 19:19 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-31 12:25 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-31 13:40 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-29 13:50 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 14:04 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 17:36 +0000
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-23 14:22 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 16:30 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 15:47 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-24 13:31 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 16:19 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 16:35 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 09:49 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 11:54 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 10:08 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 12:25 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 10:25 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-25 23:30 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 12:53 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 13:13 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 16:07 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 15:20 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 20:25 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-25 23:31 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-25 23:31 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 16:06 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:39 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 12:45 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-26 14:56 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 15:22 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 18:15 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 13:44 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 18:14 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-27 14:46 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 12:58 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 16:10 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 19:06 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:23 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 08:33 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:37 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:55 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:35 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 18:03 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-26 16:10 +0000
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:29 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 15:22 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 16:42 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 22:40 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 23:12 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 00:16 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 09:25 -0500
Alfven waves are a) slow, b) medium and c) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 13:06 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 04:24 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 08:15 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 10:39 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 09:57 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 13:26 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 09:47 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 12:16 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 11:11 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 15:04 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 18:36 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 18:46 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 20:37 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 09:49 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 19:01 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 21:08 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 20:24 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 08:22 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 09:36 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 19:11 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 10:23 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 18:03 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 18:23 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 20:16 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 06:59 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 05:47 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 07:49 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 06:08 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 08:47 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 10:42 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 08:07 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 11:27 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 10:07 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 14:25 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 12:32 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 08:12 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 08:24 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 08:50 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 14:21 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 09:39 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 14:20 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 10:45 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 10:18 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 10:25 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 12:44 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-03 17:55 +0000
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 13:07 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 11:17 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 13:27 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 14:45 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 16:59 -0500
que noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 15:51 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 08:01 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:42 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 12:59 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-26 14:13 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-28 00:46 +0200
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 18:47 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-28 08:59 +0200
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 12:49 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 13:10 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-28 16:29 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 16:57 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-28 20:09 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 15:22 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-30 17:48 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 16:28 -0500
antijohn cersus johnboy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 15:22 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-29 12:46 +0200
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 07:36 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 09:10 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-30 20:21 +0200
waves in anti-\matter noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 10:34 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 09:20 -0500
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 07:58 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 10:45 -0500
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 16:04 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-01 01:30 +0000
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 09:37 -0500
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 09:25 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 12:38 -0500
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 12:00 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-29 23:14 +0200
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 09:16 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-29 03:39 +0200
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-29 03:29 +0200
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-30 21:09 +0200
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 19:15 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 18:04 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-23 14:26 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-05-23 14:57 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 15:03 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 21:29 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-24 13:40 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 16:51 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-24 23:41 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 03:09 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-25 23:26 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 19:09 -0700
Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 16:09 -0700
Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 17:14 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 19:41 -0500
Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 17:59 -0700
Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 18:16 -0700
Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 18:27 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-30 02:29 +0000
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 19:48 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-30 15:16 +0000
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 09:27 -0500
csiph-web