Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #579588 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-22 14:05 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-05-31 09:27 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 192 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Is antimatter anti-gravity? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-22 14:05 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 14:55 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-05-22 18:01 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 18:03 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 19:06 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 19:17 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 11:34 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 09:38 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 12:29 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-28 00:10 +0200
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 15:15 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 17:27 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-29 12:30 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 11:56 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-29 17:23 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-30 00:05 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 01:10 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 06:32 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 07:05 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 07:15 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 07:30 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-30 14:29 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-30 08:35 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 08:44 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-30 14:32 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-30 12:45 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 15:30 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 17:28 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-30 21:08 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-30 13:41 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-30 12:17 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-30 20:40 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-30 19:19 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-31 12:25 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-31 13:40 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-29 13:50 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 14:04 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 17:36 +0000
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-23 14:22 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 16:30 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 15:47 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-24 13:31 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 16:19 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 16:35 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 09:49 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 11:54 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 10:08 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 12:25 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 10:25 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-25 23:30 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 12:53 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 13:13 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 16:07 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 15:20 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 20:25 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-25 23:31 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-25 23:31 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 16:06 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:39 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 12:45 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-26 14:56 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 15:22 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 18:15 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 13:44 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 18:14 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-27 14:46 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 12:58 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 16:10 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 19:06 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:23 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 08:33 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:37 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:55 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:35 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 18:03 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-26 16:10 +0000
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:29 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 15:22 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 16:42 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 22:40 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 23:12 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 00:16 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 09:25 -0500
Alfven waves are a) slow, b) medium and c) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 13:06 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 04:24 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 08:15 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 10:39 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 09:57 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 13:26 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 09:47 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 12:16 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 11:11 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 15:04 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 18:36 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 18:46 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 20:37 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 09:49 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 19:01 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 21:08 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 20:24 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 08:22 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 09:36 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 19:11 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 10:23 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 18:03 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 18:23 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 20:16 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 06:59 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 05:47 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 07:49 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 06:08 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 08:47 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 10:42 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 08:07 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 11:27 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 10:07 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 14:25 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 12:32 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 08:12 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 08:24 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 08:50 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 14:21 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 09:39 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 14:20 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 10:45 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 10:18 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 10:25 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 12:44 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-03 17:55 +0000
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 13:07 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 11:17 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 13:27 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 14:45 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 16:59 -0500
que noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 15:51 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 08:01 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:42 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 12:59 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-26 14:13 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-28 00:46 +0200
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 18:47 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-28 08:59 +0200
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 12:49 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 13:10 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-28 16:29 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 16:57 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-28 20:09 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 15:22 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-30 17:48 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 16:28 -0500
antijohn cersus johnboy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 15:22 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-29 12:46 +0200
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 07:36 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 09:10 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-30 20:21 +0200
waves in anti-\matter noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 10:34 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 09:20 -0500
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 07:58 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 10:45 -0500
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 16:04 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-01 01:30 +0000
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 09:37 -0500
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 09:25 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 12:38 -0500
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 12:00 -0700
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-29 23:14 +0200
Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 09:16 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-29 03:39 +0200
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-29 03:29 +0200
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-30 21:09 +0200
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 19:15 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 18:04 -0500
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-23 14:26 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-05-23 14:57 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 15:03 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-23 21:29 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-24 13:40 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 16:51 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-24 23:41 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 03:09 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-25 23:26 -0400
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 19:09 -0700
Is antimatter anti-gravity? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 16:09 -0700
Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 17:14 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 19:41 -0500
Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 17:59 -0700
Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 18:16 -0700
Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 18:27 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-30 02:29 +0000
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 19:48 -0700
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-30 15:16 +0000
Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 09:27 -0500
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 07:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0916660b-3b0d-44df-8ff7-eb68eb25b328@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #581698 |
10:15 AMjohn Yes, HVAC, Canada is safe sitting right on the USA north border. Plus, living in the cold is really enjoyable. Really! ------------ John, it's long been my goal to annex both Canada and Mexico into a United States of North America. It's got a nice ring to it. And don't forget that I live in nh which shares a border with Canada. So, ya... We know about cold
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobodyxx@gmail> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 14:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <574c8695$0$19996$c3e8da3$1cbc7475@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #581700 |
On 05/30/2016 10:30 AM, HVAC wrote: > > 10:15 AMjohn > Yes, HVAC, > Canada is safe sitting right on the USA > north border. > Plus, living in the cold is really enjoyable. > Really! > ------------ > > John, it's long been my goal to annex both Canada and Mexico into a United States of North America. It's got a nice ring to it. > > And don't forget that I live in nh which shares a border with Canada. So, ya... We know about cold > He lies. His idea is to join the entire world in to a massive Fourth Reich. It will last for 1000 years I heard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 08:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nihmkm$snk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #581663 |
Harlow Campbell "HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: > > "Custard" aka "<clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> "ClutterFreak" aka Mehram Maleki the Iranian USA hater, wrote: > Hahahah :-)) I doubt it but, oh boy that'd be real > sick of some sorry ass among them. Homeland security > should have better things to do. Hvac is hanson (I > have proof- easily obtained from old headers) or are > each others' significant other, and unless he's > recently taken another leap downward he'd go to no > such length as to spend money for it too. > ------------- > Harlow Campbell wrote: > Damn! He's on to us. The jig is up. > That incredible deductive logic did me in > hanson wrote: LOL... but "I doubt it", Mehram said. So, Harlow, you are safe, bro! Have a great Memorial-day and -otherwise And thanks for the laughs, guys... ahahahahanson > > > > > Hey Mehram, since you are not in a festive mood, let me re-post the tripe that celebrates your heroism: > --------------------- Repost --------------------------- > .... ahahahahaha.. THIS is RICH!.... ROTFLMAO! > "<clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> "ClutterFreak", aka Mehram Maleki the Iranian USA hater, wrote: > "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> Mark L. Fergerson, the 70 year old Wal-Mart-Greeter who still hates his father, wrote: <snip crap> > Sefton john wrote: <look up the posts of john's SR/GR critic > > Mehram Maleki wrote: > Hvac is hanson. I have proof- easily obtained from old > headers, or are > each others' significant other, and > unless he's recently taken another leap downward > he'd go to no such length as to spend money for it too. > hanson wrote: ahahahaha... AHAHAHA.. This is rich!... ROTFLMAO! Mehram, change your meds. They are making you paranoid delusional & forgetful. Can't you remember that a few days after you heroically started to use Jew Bert Glazier's <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> HATE speech, as your sig you , Maleki, had a bout with > Harlow Campbell "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> who wrote: "I am hanson" > That's all there is to it. If Harlow likes to be me, hanson, Kudos to him, and if it confused and cranked you, Mehram, all the better for that... Pity, ... but ahahahahaha... LOL > Mehram wrote: > I spent about 45 minutes to nail hvac-hanson connection > and still regret the wasted time. > hanson wrote: Now Mehram, which one cranked you the most, HVAC, hanson, or "__", or the Wal-Mart Greeter, who told you that you are a paranoid moron? > Mehram signed off with & wrote: > "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And > have a good laugh when it seeps down on > your face." > - Bert > hanson wrote: Now Mehram, seriously, if you can't stand the heat then do not use that sig.... which would be a shame. > KEEP ON DOING IT. EXPOSE the JEWISH HATE speech from kike Bert Glazier <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> > Most of the Posters here are Jews or bible beating goyim that belief Jews to be the Chosen People. > Nobody else here but you has the interest or the balls to call Full-Swine and criminal Graveyard vandal Bert Glazier on it! ... Carry on! Good job! > I will remind you of your heroism whenever I see it, "and have a good laugh" doing it... ahahahahahanson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 08:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7ae4c63c-5f39-4aa6-95a7-341652d8cc04@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #581709 |
Harlow Campbell wrote: > Damn! He's on to us. The jig is up. > That incredible deductive logic did me in > hanson wrote: LOL... but "I doubt it", Mehram said. So, Harlow, you are safe, bro! Have a great Memorial-day and -otherwise And thanks for the laughs, guys... ahahahahanson > -------- Thank you, Mr Hanson I was withholding judgement on Custard before making my final determination to what clique to assign him in this group. As always I was my typical polite self up until he chose to align with the kook faction and insult me. So be it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobodyxx@gmail> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 14:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <574c8742$0$19996$c3e8da3$1cbc7475@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #581711 |
On 05/30/2016 11:44 AM, HVAC wrote: > > Harlow Campbell wrote: >> Damn! He's on to us. The jig is up. >> That incredible deductive logic did me in >> > hanson wrote: > LOL... but "I doubt it", Mehram said. > So, Harlow, you are safe, bro! > Have a great Memorial-day and -otherwise > And thanks for the laughs, guys... ahahahahanson >> > -------- > > Thank you, Mr Hanson > > I was withholding judgement on Custard before making my final determination to what clique to assign him in this group. > > As always I was my typical polite self up until he chose to align with the kook faction and insult me. > > So be it > Truth is truth, fun is fun.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 12:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nii59f$k5l$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #581730 |
"benj" <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote: > HVAC wrote: >> >> Harlow Campbell wrote: >>> Damn! He's on to us. The jig is up. >>> That incredible deductive logic did me in >>> >> hanson wrote: >> LOL... but "I doubt it", Mehram said. >> So, Harlow, you are safe, bro! >> Have a great Memorial-day and -otherwise >> And thanks for the laughs, guys... ahahahahanson >>> Harlow Campbell wrote: >> Thank you, Mr Hanson >> I was withholding judgement on Custard aka "ClutterFreak" >> <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> Mehram Maleki, the >> Iranian before making my final determination to what clique >> to assign him in this group. >> As always I was my typical polite self up until he chose to >> align with the kook faction and insult me. >> So be it >> Benj wrote: > Truth is truth, fun is fun. > hanson wrote: Ben, the Prime directive is for Mehram to keep on with him to expose Full-Swine Glazer's Jewish Hate speech. > Now Ben, your 1-liner is kinda iffy, as it lacks definitions. OTOH your 1-liner is an example of how evolution 'works. > Hopefully we can start discussing those "forbiddensubjects" together, along with Mehram, and shine some light on your "God = Nature" notion, given how the folks from Gobeckli tepe viewed the situation.... some 12KY ago, with the Abrahamic Idea/l/s still some 7KY in the then future, asking why it turned out that way. Take care, Ben.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 15:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d160c1a3-799a-43d5-b74c-1560e129e1e2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #581730 |
BJ quacked > > As always I was my typical polite self up until he chose to align with the kook faction and insult me. > > So be it > Truth is truth, fun is fun. ----------- And froth us froth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 17:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2d28f9fc-ad71-4114-9f4f-1cd9e8d2d6dc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #581755 |
Froth us, baby!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobodyxx@gmail> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 21:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <574ce426$0$45339$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #581755 |
On 05/30/2016 06:30 PM, HVAC wrote: > BJ quacked >> >> As always I was my typical polite self up until he chose to align with the kook faction and insult me. >> >> So be it >> > > Truth is truth, fun is fun. > ----------- > > And froth us froth > For HVAC "Froth" means "someone speaking truth".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 13:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <a8hrnu4x9wmw$.14ogn5t8tt4g.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #581663 |
On Mon, 30 May 2016 01:10:37 -0700 (PDT), HVAC wrote:
> Custard
> Hahahah :-)) I doubt it but, oh boy that'd be real
> sick of some sorry ass among them. Homeland security
> should have better things to do. Hvac is hanson (I
> have proof- easily obtained from old headers) or are
> each others' significant other, and unless he's
> recently taken another leap downward he'd go to no
> such length as to spend money for it too.
> -------------
>
> Damn! He's on to us. The jig is up.
> That incredible deductive logic did me in
No, same stupidities did you in.
Do you want to talk about it? I doubt it :) Run away
now as usual.
--
"Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And
have a good laugh when it seeps down on
your face."
- Bert
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 12:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nii3k5$e3l$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #581732 |
Custard "ClutterFreak" <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> was bent on a needless re-banter with HVAC, who too, like Maleki, was exposing Bert Glazier's Jewish Hate Speech. You 2 guys do a fine job on that. Kudos and carry on. > >> Custard wrote >> Hahahah :-)) I doubt it but, oh boy that'd be real >> sick of some sorry ass among them. Homeland security >> should have better things to do. Hvac is hanson (I >> have proof- easily obtained from old headers) or are >> each others' significant other, and unless he's >> recently taken another leap downward he'd go to no >> such length as to spend money for it too. >> ------------- HVAC wrote: >> Damn! He's on to us. The jig is up. >> That incredible deductive logic did me in > Custard wrote: > No, same stupidities did you in. > Do you want to talk about it? I doubt it :) > Run away now as usual. > -- > "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And > have a good laugh when it seeps down on > your face." > - Bert hanson wrote: Excellent, Mehram keep on with showing the Hate speech from Jew Bert Glazier <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> . Most of the Posters here are Jews or bible beating goyim that belief Jews to be the Chosen People. Nobody else here but you 2 guys has the interest or the balls to call Full-Swine and criminal Graveyard vandal Bert Glazier on it! Carry on! Good job! > Now Mehram, since you are not in a festive mood, let me re-post the tripe that celebrates your heroism: > --------------------- Repost --------------------------- > .... ahahahahaha.. THIS is RICH!.... ROTFLMAO! > "<clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> "ClutterFreak", aka Mehram Maleki the Iranian USA hater, wrote: > "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> Mark L. Fergerson, the 70 year old Wal-Mart-Greeter who still hates his father, wrote: <snip crap> > Sefton john wrote: <look up the posts of john's SR/GR critic > > Mehram Maleki wrote: > Hvac is hanson. I have proof- easily obtained from old > headers, or are > each others' significant other, and > unless he's recently taken another leap downward > he'd go to no such length as to spend money for it too. > hanson wrote: ahahahaha... AHAHAHA.. This is rich!... ROTFLMAO! Mehram, change your meds. They are making you paranoid delusional & forgetful. Can't you remember that a few days after you heroically started to use Jew Bert Glazier's <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> HATE speech, as your sig you , Maleki, had a bout with > Harlow Campbell "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> who wrote: "I am hanson" > That's all there is to it. If Harlow likes to be me, hanson, Kudos to him, and if it confused and cranked you, Mehram, all the better for that... Pity, ... but ahahahahaha... LOL > Mehram wrote: > I spent about 45 minutes to nail hvac-hanson connection > and still regret the wasted time. > hanson wrote: Now Mehram, which one cranked you the most, HVAC, hanson, or "__", or the Wal-Mart Greeter, who told you that you are a paranoid moron? > Mehram signed off with & wrote: > "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And > have a good laugh when it seeps down on > your face." > - Bert > hanson wrote: Now Mehram, seriously, if you can't stand the heat then do not use that sig.... which would be a shame. > KEEP ON DOING IT. EXPOSE the JEWISH HATE speech from kike Bert Glazier <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> > Most of the Posters here are Jews or bible beating goyim that belief Jews to be the Chosen People. > Nobody else here but you has the interest or the balls to call Full-Swine and criminal Graveyard vandal Bert Glazier on it! ... Carry on! Good job! > I will remind you of your heroism whenever I see it, "and have a good laugh" doing it... ahahahahahanson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 20:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1vjgyr5sr7f0g$.sn8myfnt87js.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #581739 |
On Mon, 30 May 2016 12:17:13 -0700, hanson wrote:
> then do not use that sig....
Ahah! Here I check on you after a month and you've
already started begging. Poor invalid soul .. I
thought you'd keep the face up longer than this.
Beg a bit more hanson. There is no shame in begging
for it. You'd be begging art, not me. It is the
artistic power in what Bert said. It carves itself
into stone (co)hanson.
--
"Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And
have a good laugh when it seeps down on
your face."
- Bert
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 19:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <niisc3$nqo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #581787 |
The Iranian Muslim Custard "ClutterFreak" Mehram Maleki <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> got irate over HVAC's tripe and became a great cyber-data miner who found that: > hanson wrote: >> Mehram, if you can't stand the heat >> then do not use that sig anymore.... > Custard wrote: > Ahah! Here I check on you after a month and you've > already started begging. Poor invalid soul .. I > thought you'd keep the face up longer than this. > > Beg a bit more hanson. There is no shame in begging > for it. You'd be begging art, not me. It is the > artistic power in what Bert said. It carves itself > into stone (co)hanson. > hanson wrote: ... ahahahaha.., what begging Mehram?. You are stoned and delusional again. I made you a big time compliment. Change neds. Calm down. > ----------- Mehram's Heroism -------------] > From the stand point of the Iranian Muslin Custard "ClutterFreak" <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> aka Mehram Maleki, it is fully understandable why Maleki exposes, with glee, the Jewish HATE SPEECH by Bert Glazier <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> who said. > -- > "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And > have a good laugh when it seeps down on > your face." > - Bert > Good job, Mehram. Carry on! > -- > "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And > have a good laugh when it seeps down on > your face." > - Bert > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-31 12:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <84uekn8n1mi1.pondiz6p5jiy.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #581793 |
On Mon, 30 May 2016 19:19:32 -0700, hanson wrote:
> then do not use that sig anymore....
Beg some more, idiot.
Here, Bert has got somebody speaking to you:
www.jango.com/music/TRAVIS%20SCOTT/Piss%20On%20Your%20Grave
--
"Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And
have a good laugh when it seeps down on
your face."
- Bert
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-31 13:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <niksu9$d4a$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #581915 |
TThe Iranian Muslim "ClutterFreak" Mehram Maleki <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> is a geriatric, shizoid mental patient, who confessed on 19-5-2016, that _ "Maleki is talking bullshit"_ which was snipped cuz all that Maleki really wanted to say was: > -- > "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And > have a good laugh when it seeps down on > your face." > - Bert > Maleki, beg some more, idiot. Here, Bert is speaking to you: > Face shitter Bert Glazier "reber g=emc^2", the Jew, also bragged to have _"PFM"_= "Poop For Maleki": <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> which Maleki eats, smiled & said: "iss aaal goo, biatch" & insts that pissing on graves is "artistic power; pure Poetry", adding: "I give hanson a look, & I spit on him". > So much for Yiddisher & Islamist Religion & Culture. Thanks for the laugh though you 2 splendid pig shits AHAHAHAHAHAHA.. ..... ahahahahahanson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-29 13:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nifkmo$6vu$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #581511 |
"ClutterFreak" <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> wrote: > This message made it thru: > "ClutterFreak" <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> aka the Iranian Muslim Mehram Maleki is still under the grip and control of the deranged 88 year old Jew <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Bert Glazier. ROTFLMAO
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-29 14:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nifef3$270$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #581096 |
On 5/27/2016 5:15 PM, john wrote: > The fact that they did a "test" > and let it hang long enough for > papers to be written > screams HOAX > How do you think science works, John? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-23 17:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nhvf3i$3ar$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #579813 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Odd >The same way they replicate the >signal of a never-before-heard >anything- like a gravitational wave? >You pull it out of your ass Nope. Scientists go through the physics and math and essentially say, "If gravity waves exist according to how General Relativity predicts, then two orbiting black holes radiatinhg gravitational waves will do *this*". (it is actually a complicated computer simulation, but it will come up with specific behavior given initial conditions). Along comes a signal that just happens to look like one of those simulations, and the scientists go back to their computers and work until they can figure out the exact initial conditions that happen to match what they saw. When they did that, they announce they found something, because they actually saw something. Similarly, a (much simpler) theory predicts antimatter is repelled by matter gravitationally. That predicts that antimatter will fall up. However, here is the difference. So far we don't have a chunk of antimatter that we can reliably observe falling up or down yet. So the situations are not the same. The answer has not come in yet for antimatter, while we do have (at least) one observation of gravitational waves. BTW when they did the gravity wave announcement, I did a web search to see what they would sound like if converted to audio. I found several - just about all of them were created long _before_ the announcement or even the observation. These are simply scientists who did the physics and computer simulations of black hole pairs, and without the help of any actual gravity wave observations. *That* is equivalent to the current state of whether antimatter falls up or not.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-23 14:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0102766d-109a-4065-a6ae-e8bae3d8a55d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #579836 |
On Monday, May 23, 2016 at 10:37:28 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote: > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > > >Odd > >The same way they replicate the > >signal of a never-before-heard > >anything- like a gravitational wave? > >You pull it out of your ass > > Nope. Scientists go through the physics and math and essentially say, "If > gravity waves exist according to how General Relativity predicts, then two > orbiting black holes radiatinhg gravitational waves will do *this*". Has it occurred to anyone that gravitational waves might orbit or fall into those black holes that same way light waves do? Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-23 16:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <QKydnSDz5Pr4697KnZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #579895 |
On 5/23/16 4:22 PM, Double-A wrote: > Has it occurred to anyone that gravitational waves might orbit or fall into those black holes that same way light waves do? > > Double-A Gravitational waves are ripples in space-time, not pieces on matter or energy carried by Fermions or Bosons. the gravitational wave just ripple right through. Gravity is unshielded, even by black holes. Gravity waves are unshielded, even by black holes. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web