Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #284607

Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/05/2016 22:47, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:ngt1f4$j99$4@dont-email.me...
>> On 10/05/2016 10:01, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 9 May 2016 06:48:29 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:ne3n4i$20g$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wow, Roger, you ran away twice, in one post!!!  No, three times!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Even if that were true you are unable to show me any other buildings
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> collapse with "Surviving Corners" so you have not been able to prove
>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>> bullshit about the Twin Towers.   <G>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You didn't answer when you were asked for another example of a
>>>>>>> building
>>>>>>> that had been "nuked", so we could compare it to the WTC buildings.
>>>>>>> You ran away, instead.
>>>>>
>>>>>> You are the one running away because you are unable to prove that
>>>>>> collapsing
>>>>>> buildings should leave "Surviving Corners" the way they were left when
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> Twin Towers were MRR nuked.
>>>>>
>>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about
>>>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they
>>>>> were
>>>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can
>>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and
>>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked.
>>>> Don't
>>>> forget this only happens one way:
>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>
>>>> ROTFLMAO
>>>
>>>        Hey, k00k. When will you show us the results of the  mass
>>> spectrometry of the WTC dust sample that, according to you, shows the
>>> presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can only be made
>>> by nuclear explosions?
>>>        You've been asked for it many times over many, many months. Yet
>>> all you've ever done is live up to your name of Run Away Roger.
>>>        Will you answer it now, or continue to admit the WTC was not
>>> nuked?
>>>
>>>
>>> Brave Sir [Roger] ran away
>>> Bravely ran away, away
>>> When [the TRUTH]  reared its ugly head
>>> He bravely turned his tail and fled
>>> Yes, brave Sir [Roger] turned about
>>> And gallantly he chickened out
>>> Bravely taking to his feet
>>> He beat a very brave retreat
>>> Bravest of the brave, Sir [Roger]!
>>>
>>>
>>> "Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
>>> belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
>>>
>>> Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
>>> on 9/11/01 in
>>> Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
>>>
>>
>> He can't explain it, it was probably something he was told (so it must be
>> true).
>
> I see t-ANNOY is back at it.
>
> Dude, I don't have to do squat because this photo says something else
> destroyed the Twin Towers besides the rumored "global collapse."
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> The above photo says the Twin Towers had to be vaporized before they could
> crush the "Surviving Corners."  <G>
>
> And that is all I have to post because posters will have to deal with that
> hurdle before they can do anything else.  DUH
>
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> Rocky
>
>

Thank you for confirming that you have no evidence to back up what you 
posted.
To help you I will repost the question asked of you.

"When will you show us the results of the  mass
spectrometry of the WTC dust sample that, according to you, shows the
presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can only be made
by nuclear explosions?"

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-03-31 12:49 -0500
  Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:53 -0700
  Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 14:32 -0500
    Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 23:39 +0100
    Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-09 06:48 -0500
      Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-09 09:45 -0500
        Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-05-09 09:01 -0700
          Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-05-09 09:24 -0700
            Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 10:43 -0500
              Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-05-10 17:31 -0700
          Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-09 14:06 -0700
            Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-05-09 18:51 -0700
        Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 10:50 -0500
          Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 17:18 +0100
            Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 15:11 -0500
              Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 22:52 +0100
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 17:02 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 23:28 +0100
              Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:55 -0500
          Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:54 -0500
      Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 04:01 -0500
        Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 17:19 +0100
          Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 16:47 -0500
            Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 22:56 +0100
              Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-11 06:40 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-11 22:38 +0100
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 03:23 -0500
              Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 08:47 -0500
            Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:56 -0500
          Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:56 -0500
  Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-04-23 09:44 -0700
    Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 12:19 -0500

csiph-web