Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #354437

Re: Snit digest 232 / 2016-05-10

From Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Snit digest 232 / 2016-05-10
Date 2016-05-10 14:03 +0200
Organization DNLA GmbH
Message-ID <ngsigi$ph2$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <ngrk3h$p9$1@dont-email.me> <sandman-17780f09508a73fbf716602244561ba9@individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Sandman wrote:

> In article <ngrk3h$p9$1@dont-email.me>, Ginseng Root wrote:
> 
>> [1670] You keep claiming that I lie (258) yet all you can point to is
>> [1670] other people accusing me of lying (259). You are unable to point
>> [1670] to direct lies (260) made by me.
> 
> Let's take an easy one to start off, shall we?
> 
> 
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/vGXGplVOYj8/l
> hYYSbs-zNYJ>
> 
> That's a post by you to csma where you used TOR to hide your IP. The IP
> used to post to usenet there is. You have already admitted that this was a
> post by you.
> 
>   Snit
>   Re: done
>   05/01/2016 <D34BA014.718C7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
> 
>   "in CSMA, years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as
>    a joke and admitted it as soon as asked"
> 
> And if that isn't specific enough for you, here are you admitting to
> having written that specific message in direct response:
> 
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/?
> hl=en#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/j1dtaa9mRy4/gOB_e4jrDXcJ>
> 
>    "Sandman found a post of mine from years ago"

Well, it wasn't "years ago" that Snit Michael Glasser posted as "Brock 
McNuggets" to the KDE team, claiming to provide "bug reports"

But no, Snit Michael Glasser never uses false identities when posting. He 
has explicitly stated that *often* and who are we to not believe Snit 
Michael Glasser, who is (in his own words) a "rare breed, being honorable 
and honest"
Who is so incredibly "honorable and honest" that he can't even use his own 
name (which should be connected to a "honorable and honest" citizen) when 
providing "bug reports". 

One has to ask: What is so extremely dangerous when providing bug reports 
that the "honorable and honest" Snit Michael Glasser has to hide his 
identity even there?

In short: one can't eat enough to puke by this barrage of constant lies and 
utter dishonesty by Snit Michael Glasser

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? Ginseng Root <ginsengroot@noplacespecial.net> - 2016-05-10 03:21 +0000
  Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 20:52 -0700
    Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-09 21:22 -0700
  Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-09 21:23 -0700
  Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-10 06:34 +0000
  Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-10 09:44 +0200
    Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-05-10 10:11 +0100
  Snit digest 232 / 2016-05-10 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-10 11:04 +0000
    Re: Snit digest 232 / 2016-05-10 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-10 14:03 +0200
  Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 13:49 +0000

csiph-web