Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #354435

Snit digest 232 / 2016-05-10

From Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Snit digest 232 / 2016-05-10
Date 2016-05-10 11:04 +0000
Message-ID <sandman-17780f09508a73fbf716602244561ba9@individual.net> (permalink)
References <ngrk3h$p9$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


In article <ngrk3h$p9$1@dont-email.me>, Ginseng Root wrote:

> [1670] You keep claiming that I lie (258) yet all you can point to is
> [1670] other people accusing me of lying (259). You are unable to point
> [1670] to direct lies (260) made by me.

Let's take an easy one to start off, shall we?

<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/vGXGplVOYj8/l
hYYSbs-zNYJ>

That's a post by you to csma where you used TOR to hide your IP. The IP used to 
post to usenet there is. You have already admitted that this was a post by you.

  Snit
  Re: done
  05/01/2016 <D34BA014.718C7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

  "in CSMA, years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as
   a joke and admitted it as soon as asked"

And if that isn't specific enough for you, here are you admitting to having 
written that specific message in direct response:

<https://groups.google.com/forum/?
hl=en#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/j1dtaa9mRy4/gOB_e4jrDXcJ>

   "Sandman found a post of mine from years ago"

And then you've said this:

  Snit
  12/17/2015 12:43:38 AM <D297453A.672BC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

  "I use a Usenet provider that does not post my IP, but I do
   not use any such anonymizer service for Usenet."

Which, as can be seen, is a blatant lie. You have already admitted to using TOR 
for posting to usenet and then lied about it.





Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 troll          0   110 | lying/lie      4   261 | incest         0     2 
 sex            0     0 | honorable      0     7 | honest         0    45 
 run            0    13 | css            0    17 | tilde          0     0 

-- 
Sandman

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? Ginseng Root <ginsengroot@noplacespecial.net> - 2016-05-10 03:21 +0000
  Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 20:52 -0700
    Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-09 21:22 -0700
  Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-09 21:23 -0700
  Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-10 06:34 +0000
  Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-10 09:44 +0200
    Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-05-10 10:11 +0100
  Snit digest 232 / 2016-05-10 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-10 11:04 +0000
    Re: Snit digest 232 / 2016-05-10 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-10 14:03 +0200
  Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 13:49 +0000

csiph-web