Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #354435
| From | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Snit digest 232 / 2016-05-10 |
| Date | 2016-05-10 11:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sandman-17780f09508a73fbf716602244561ba9@individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ngrk3h$p9$1@dont-email.me> |
In article <ngrk3h$p9$1@dont-email.me>, Ginseng Root wrote: > [1670] You keep claiming that I lie (258) yet all you can point to is > [1670] other people accusing me of lying (259). You are unable to point > [1670] to direct lies (260) made by me. Let's take an easy one to start off, shall we? <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/vGXGplVOYj8/l hYYSbs-zNYJ> That's a post by you to csma where you used TOR to hide your IP. The IP used to post to usenet there is. You have already admitted that this was a post by you. Snit Re: done 05/01/2016 <D34BA014.718C7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> "in CSMA, years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as a joke and admitted it as soon as asked" And if that isn't specific enough for you, here are you admitting to having written that specific message in direct response: <https://groups.google.com/forum/? hl=en#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/j1dtaa9mRy4/gOB_e4jrDXcJ> "Sandman found a post of mine from years ago" And then you've said this: Snit 12/17/2015 12:43:38 AM <D297453A.672BC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> "I use a Usenet provider that does not post my IP, but I do not use any such anonymizer service for Usenet." Which, as can be seen, is a blatant lie. You have already admitted to using TOR for posting to usenet and then lied about it. Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 0 110 | lying/lie 4 261 | incest 0 2 sex 0 0 | honorable 0 7 | honest 0 45 run 0 13 | css 0 17 | tilde 0 0 -- Sandman
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? Ginseng Root <ginsengroot@noplacespecial.net> - 2016-05-10 03:21 +0000
Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 20:52 -0700
Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-09 21:22 -0700
Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-09 21:23 -0700
Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-10 06:34 +0000
Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-10 09:44 +0200
Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-05-10 10:11 +0100
Snit digest 232 / 2016-05-10 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-10 11:04 +0000
Re: Snit digest 232 / 2016-05-10 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-10 14:03 +0200
Re: Where is the proof Steve Petruzzellis? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 13:49 +0000
csiph-web