Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > ger.ct > #252220

Re: O2 can't do

From Joerg Sub <joergsub@rocketmail.com>
Newsgroups ger.ct
Subject Re: O2 can't do
Date 2016-04-26 17:02 +0200
Organization albasani.net
Message-ID <nfo00c$odi$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References <1mav21w0wuf0c$.1sycimyi3nmh5.dlg@40tude.net> <do256nFk7kkU1@mid.individual.net> <1wffjrabrp2d7$.lug92c03olce.dlg@40tude.net> <800db9e4-54a3-464d-a0bb-80a85323a2a4@googlegroups.com> <dfu2zo57yhmz.1hdym71vtj25f$.dlg@40tude.net>

Show all headers | View raw

Am 24.04.2016 um 18:50 schrieb Daniel Meyer:
> Am Sun, 24 Apr 2016 07:29:20 -0700 (PDT) schrieb Lothar Frings:
>
>> Sie könnten auch sagen "Wir haben nur einen Umschlag
>> bekommen, aber darin war kein Brief". Jahrzehntealter
>> Klassiker, erfunden von Mietern, die die Kündigung
>> abwenden wollten.
>
> Diees Argument hört man immer wieder und klar könnte ein Absender das so
> machen. Gibt es aber einen belegbaren Fall, wo ein professioneller
> Anbieter/Empfänger tatsächlich dem Empfang eines leeren Umschlages
> behauptet hat und dann vor Gericht damit durchgekommen ist?

Lehnt der Empfänger den Eingang ab, hat er sogar einen Nachweiß,
dass das Schreiben nicht eingegangen ist. Einschreiben-Rückschein
spielt so dem Gegenüber in die Hände.

Lieber auf zweifachen Weg senden. Per Briefpost und per Fax, oder
per Email, oder Webform. Das sieht vor Gericht dann seltsam aus,
wer behauptet auf doppelten Wege nichts erhalten zu haben. Mein
Richter empfand es so.  :-)



-- 
Thomas Grund wrote: "Ich entschuldige mich für meine unpräzise Frage:
                      Weiß jemand außer Thomas Lahn was darüber?"

Back to ger.ct | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

O2 can't do Frank Hucklenbroich <Hucklenbroich01@aol.com> - 2016-04-23 14:32 +0200
  Re: O2 can't do Andreas Quast <bu3ro.kratz@fr33n3t.de> - 2016-04-23 15:08 +0000
    Re: O2 can't do Bernd Lauert <m8r-9vv4fj@mailinator.com> - 2016-04-23 17:05 +0000
    Re: O2 can't do Frank Hucklenbroich <Hucklenbroich01@aol.com> - 2016-04-23 21:07 +0200
    Re: O2 can't do Lothar Frings <Lothar.Frings@gmx.de> - 2016-04-24 04:04 -0700
    Re: O2 can't do "Juergen P. Meier" <nospam-1984@jors.net> - 2016-04-25 05:16 +0000
  Re: O2 can't do Hendrik van der Heijden <hvdh@gmx.de> - 2016-04-23 18:27 +0200
    Re: O2 can't do Rick Szabo  <usenet13@rickszabo.de> - 2016-04-23 18:56 +0200
    Re: O2 can't do Frank Hucklenbroich <Hucklenbroich01@aol.com> - 2016-04-23 21:17 +0200
      Re: O2 can't do Hendrik van der Heijden <hvdh@gmx.de> - 2016-04-24 11:29 +0200
      Re: O2 can't do Martin Gerdes <martin.gerdes@gmx.de> - 2016-04-24 21:32 +0200
  Re: O2 can't do Bernd Ullrich <ullrich_bernd@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-23 21:19 +0200
  Re:O2 can't do Volker Neurath  <volker.neurath@gmx.de> - 2016-04-23 22:46 +0200
    Re: O2 can't do Frank Hucklenbroich <Hucklenbroich01@aol.com> - 2016-04-24 15:16 +0200
      Re: O2 can't do Lothar Frings <Lothar.Frings@gmx.de> - 2016-04-24 07:29 -0700
        Re: O2 can't do Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2016-04-24 17:05 +0200
        Re: O2 can't do Frank Hucklenbroich <Hucklenbroich01@aol.com> - 2016-04-24 17:39 +0200
          Re: O2 can't do Lothar Frings <Lothar.Frings@gmx.de> - 2016-04-25 00:22 -0700
        Re: O2 can't do Daniel Meyer <usenet2016@gmx.de> - 2016-04-24 18:50 +0200
          Re: O2 can't do Joerg Sub <joergsub@rocketmail.com> - 2016-04-26 17:02 +0200
        Re: O2 can't do v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2016-04-24 17:35 +0000
      Re: O2 can't do "Juergen P. Meier" <nospam-1984@jors.net> - 2016-04-25 05:24 +0000
    Re: O2 can't do Martin Gerdes <martin.gerdes@gmx.de> - 2016-04-24 21:32 +0200
  Re: O2 can't do "Michael Landenberger" <spameimer052006@arcor.de> - 2016-04-23 23:15 +0200
    Re: O2 can't do Jörg Tewes <jogi1964@gmx.net> - 2016-04-24 01:17 +0200
      Re: O2 can't do v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2016-04-24 06:05 +0000
        Re: O2 can't do Ruediger Lahl <ruediger.lahl@gmx.de> - 2016-04-24 13:14 +0200
          Re: O2 can't do v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2016-04-24 17:37 +0000
    Re: O2 can't do Robin Koch <robin.koch@t-online.de> - 2016-04-24 02:03 +0200
    Re: O2 can't do Frank Hucklenbroich <Hucklenbroich01@aol.com> - 2016-04-24 15:30 +0200
      Re: O2 can't do Frank Hucklenbroich <Hucklenbroich01@aol.com> - 2016-04-24 15:54 +0200
        Re: O2 can't do "Michael Landenberger" <spameimer052006@arcor.de> - 2016-04-24 19:05 +0200
      Re: O2 can't do Hendrik van der Heijden <hvdh@gmx.de> - 2016-04-24 17:18 +0200
        Re: O2 can't do Daniel Meyer <usenet2016@gmx.de> - 2016-04-24 19:54 +0200
          Re: O2 can't do Hendrik van der Heijden <hvdh@gmx.de> - 2016-04-25 08:32 +0200
          Re: O2 can't do Hendrik van der Heijden <hvdh@gmx.de> - 2016-04-25 08:37 +0200
            Re: O2 can't do Joerg Sub <joergsub@rocketmail.com> - 2016-04-26 17:10 +0200
          Re: O2 can't do Martin Gerdes <martin.gerdes@gmx.de> - 2016-04-25 22:32 +0200
      Re: O2 can't do Martin Gerdes <martin.gerdes@gmx.de> - 2016-04-24 21:32 +0200
    Re: O2 can't do Bernd Lauert <m8r-9vv4fj@mailinator.com> - 2016-04-24 14:32 +0000
      Re: O2 can't do Sebastian Berndt <spamdelete@gmx.de> - 2016-04-25 10:44 +0200
        Re: O2 can't do Bernd Lauert <m8r-9vv4fj@mailinator.com> - 2016-04-25 16:15 +0000
  Re: O2 can't do Jörg Tewes <jogi1964@gmx.net> - 2016-04-24 01:07 +0200
  Re: O2 can't do Thomas Niering <thomas.niering@arcor.de> - 2016-04-24 09:30 +0200
    Re: O2 can't do Frank Hucklenbroich <Hucklenbroich01@aol.com> - 2016-04-24 15:34 +0200
  Re: O2 can't do Joerg Sub <joergsub@rocketmail.com> - 2016-04-24 16:08 +0200
    Re: O2 can't do Frank Hucklenbroich <Hucklenbroich01@aol.com> - 2016-04-24 17:47 +0200
    Re: O2 can't do Lothar Frings <Lothar.Frings@gmx.de> - 2016-04-24 09:03 -0700
      Re: O2 can't do Joerg Sub <joergsub@rocketmail.com> - 2016-04-26 16:38 +0200
    Re: O2 can't do Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2016-04-24 18:29 +0200
      Re: O2 can't do Lothar Frings <Lothar.Frings@gmx.de> - 2016-04-25 00:29 -0700
        Re: O2 can't do Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2016-04-25 18:36 +0200
          Re: O2 can't do Joerg Sub <joergsub@rocketmail.com> - 2016-04-26 16:35 +0200
      Re: O2 can't do Joerg Sub <joergsub@rocketmail.com> - 2016-04-26 16:34 +0200
    Re: O2 can't do Martin Gerdes <martin.gerdes@gmx.de> - 2016-04-25 22:32 +0200
      Re: O2 can't do Joerg Sub <joergsub@rocketmail.com> - 2016-04-26 16:41 +0200
  Re: O2 can't do "Juergen P. Meier" <nospam-1984@jors.net> - 2016-04-25 05:18 +0000
    Re: O2 can't do "Michael Landenberger" <spameimer052006@arcor.de> - 2016-04-25 15:14 +0200
      Re: O2 can't do "Juergen P. Meier" <nospam-1984@jors.net> - 2016-04-26 04:32 +0000
        Re: O2 can't do "Michael Landenberger" <spameimer052006@arcor.de> - 2016-04-26 23:31 +0200
          Re: O2 can't do Lothar Frings <Lothar.Frings@gmx.de> - 2016-04-26 21:40 -0700
  Re: O2 can't do "Ralph A. Schmid, dk5ras" <ralph@schmid.xxx> - 2016-04-25 09:19 +0200
    Re: O2 can't do Jörg Tewes <jogi1964@gmx.net> - 2016-04-25 13:17 +0200
      Re: O2 can't do "Ralph A. Schmid, dk5ras" <ralph@schmid.xxx> - 2016-04-25 14:00 +0200
        Re: O2 can't do Jörg Tewes <jogi1964@gmx.net> - 2016-04-25 17:39 +0200
          Re: O2 can't do "Ralph A. Schmid, dk5ras" <ralph@schmid.xxx> - 2016-04-26 09:01 +0200
  Re: O2 can't do Frank Hucklenbroich <Hucklenbroich01@aol.com> - 2016-04-26 08:19 +0200
    Re: O2 can't do "Juergen P. Meier" <nospam-1984@jors.net> - 2016-04-26 11:15 +0000
      Re: O2 can't do Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2016-04-26 14:06 +0200

csiph-web