Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar?

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar?
Date	2016-04-24 15:37 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nfjaqc$1mms$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <76cluc-dtr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <f24cdacf-f864-4e71-8be0-3945b621033f@googlegroups.com> <f7d4fd80-0acd-4a40-9c46-9ecf5176bdd2@googlegroups.com> <nfftj8$pka$4@gioia.aioe.org> <25f1ce34-c604-4cf7-a438-e11dd0e33a92@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/24/2016 12:35 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Try reading my writings without assuming "I do not know". Your replies are far far in the category
> of believing I know almost nothing, and so your reply is going to fill in some blanks. Try reading
> my posts to improve your own mind, not reading my posts to "look for alleged gaps or holes in thought".
> You are a young and dumb person to continue on your present course of replies to me.
>
> To make you a better conversant, read what the person offers, what I offer, and if you disagree, just
> say-- disagree. Stop making replies that show your disdain and low opinion of me. Of course, you hide
> behind a fake name, so probably you will not heed any of my advice, since, if you cannot even post
> with your real name shows a lack of ability to be in science.

I disagree with this statement, and I would suggest you take your own 
advice about assuming anything about my scientific ability. In my 
experience, people who post with their real names on a public internet 
forum are playing with fire and are either foolhardy or naive. Secondly, 
I think you should not confuse sci.physics with any forum where real 
science is PERFORMED. That is not its purpose and scientists certainly 
do not use sci.physics as a place to keep up with research.

>
> The National Park system is in the Executive branch of government and can easily be changed as to
> the purpose and use of the parks. In fact, the purpose and use of our parks is changing all the
> time even if no president is changing the purpose.

Nevertheless, the IUCN has as a firm requirement of National Parks the 
following:
"Highest competent authority of the country has taken steps to prevent 
or eliminate exploitation or occupation as soon as possible in the whole 
area and to effectively enforce the respect of ecological, 
geomorphological, or aesthetic features which have led to its establishment"

>
> What I was conveying was the idea that we can have both a beautiful pristine Yellowstone and have
> electric geothermal power stations there. That we can increase the size of Yellowstone and make it
> a better place.

As I mentioned, conversion of private land to public land requires 
compensation to the private land owner. There are provisions for private 
landowners to sue if the government exerts eminent domain appropriation.

>
> What you are conveying in most of your posts, is a disdain and low opinion of me. Yet, you are too
> young and dumb to realize it.

And when you declare me "young and dumb", what kind of opinion are you 
trying to convey to me?

All I'm asking for you is to be aware of some well-documented facts.

>
> AP

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

csiph-web