Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #571943
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: why are the news agencies-- tv and magazines suppressing coverage of Geothermal? And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? |
| Date | 2016-04-20 22:24 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <76cluc-dtr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <f363e2ff-6f8a-49ba-8c75-3909e97feb2f@googlegroups.com> <nf8trv$c4j$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 4/20/2016 4:49 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: >> Newsgroups: sci.math Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:12:57 -0700 (PDT) >> >> Subject: Re: Miles O'Brien, David Shukman, DW, science magazines, >> Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or >> 5000 to 1 From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> >> Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 02:12:58 +0000 >> > >> Why is the world suppressing the data, knowledge and information on >> Geothermal. Why has no science magazine covered geothermal in years? >> Why has NOVA never given a hour long program on Geothermal. >> >> Why does every coverage of Global Warming and Renewable Energy >> mention only Solar and Wind and never mention Geothermal? >> >> Is the world being suppressed of Geothermal news reporting? >> Apparently so. >> >> AP >> > > Good question, I have not seen any through indepth reporting. > > California has a spot, there is a new band along texas coastline, > Iceland, Japan, > > typically geothermal is not clean, lots of impurities, desolved minerals > that foul things up. > > there should be a GeoThermal Magazine Most of the places that are suitable for a geothermal plant already have one and there are issues about the lack of transmission lines to areas that might be usefull for a new plant. All the geothermal plants in the US together produce less than 1% of US energy requirements. California has the most and they produce less than 5% of the state needs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_energy_in_the_United_States -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
why are the news agencies-- tv and magazines suppressing coverage of Geothermal? And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 14:49 -0700
Re: why are the news agencies-- tv and magazines suppressing coverage of Geothermal? And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-20 16:54 -0500
Re: why are the news agencies-- tv and magazines suppressing coverage of Geothermal? And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-20 22:24 +0000
Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 23:11 -0700
Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 14:08 -0700
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 22:43 -0700
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 08:33 -0500
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 06:52 -0700
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 07:05 -0700
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 22:41 -0700
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-04-23 11:45 -0400
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 22:35 -0700
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 15:37 -0500
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 14:53 -0700
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? "Anon E. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2016-04-24 19:07 -0400
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-04-24 19:48 -0400
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 06:35 -0500
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 22:39 -0700
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 19:57 -0700
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 01:56 -0700
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? gaby de wilde <gdewilde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 16:01 -0700
Re: Increasing the size of Yellowstone while extracting geothermal Re: Yellowstone fully developed Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 15:04 -0700
Re: why are the news agencies-- tv and magazines suppressing coverage of Geothermal? And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 22:32 -0700
Re: why are the news agencies-- tv and magazines suppressing coverage of Geothermal? And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 10:53 -0500
Re: why are the news agencies-- tv and magazines suppressing coverage of Geothermal? And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 17:38 +0000
Re: why are the news agencies-- tv and magazines suppressing coverage of Geothermal? And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 14:04 -0700
Re: why are the news agencies-- tv and magazines suppressing coverage of Geothermal? And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? gaby de wilde <gdewilde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 07:36 -0700
Re: why are the news agencies-- tv and magazines suppressing coverage of Geothermal? And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 02:56 -0700
Re: why are the news agencies-- tv and magazines suppressing coverage of Geothermal? And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 13:51 -0700
AAAS membership Re: And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 23:28 -0700
Re: why are the news agencies-- tv and magazines suppressing coverage of Geothermal? And is geothermal 5,000 times superior to solar? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 23:43 -0700
csiph-web