Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets
Date	2016-04-21 13:32 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nfb6b7$1pp3$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <4f2f05cf-85e1-4654-9298-3249a34d148a@googlegroups.com> <nf8utq$dtd$2@gioia.aioe.org> <696c88bd-2eb6-46e8-b0cf-2d55fbc33259@googlegroups.com> <nfanrd$111d$1@gioia.aioe.org> <9ac41784-e54e-4f84-8c28-b62f935446a8@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/21/2016 1:14 PM, Peter Riedt wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 10:24:51 PM UTC+8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 4/20/2016 10:25 PM, Peter Riedt wrote:
>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 6:13:20 AM UTC+8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> On 4/20/2016 4:46 PM, Peter Riedt wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 7:38:25 PM UTC+8, Poutnik Fornntp wrote:
>>>>>> Dne středa 20. dubna 2016 11:12:08 UTC+2 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your formula absolute potential energy = GM*m/r in the form of the ratio
>>>>>>> Aphelion:Perihelion=GM*m/Aphelion:GM*m/Perihelion
>>>>>>> produces the identical results for the nine planets as my ratio
>>>>>>> Aphelion:Perihelion=mass*G*heightaph:Aphelion*mass*G*heightper.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is not easier to to learn the things properly at first place ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PE(r) = integral[inf..r]  ( vec_F . vec_dr ) =
>>>>>>          = integral[inf..r]  ( G.M.m/|r|^2 . vec_dr ) =
>>>>>>          = - G.M.m/r
>>>>>
>>>>> (-GM*m/r)+(mass*G*height)=0. Occam's razor.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Simple is no excuse for being wrong.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>
>>> Prove that my equation is not zero.
>>>
>>
>> Data proves it wrong, Peter.
>>
>> We'll take just one example. Let's consider a 10.0 kg stone held 3.5 m
>> above sea level at the equator.
>> mass = m = 10.0 kg.
>> height = 3.5 m
>> r =  6,378,137 m + 3.5 m
>> M = 5.972 × 10^24 kg
>> G = 6.67408 × 10-11 m^3 kg^-1 s^-2
>>
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>
> The formula mgh of Leibniz uses little g (9.81 for earth, 274 for sun).
>

But you did not write little g. You used big G and claimed that was the 
right thing to do. You will notice that if you actually use the value of 
bit G, your equation does not come out to zero. So your equation is 
wrong, Peter. Simple (Occam's razor) is not an excuse for being wrong.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-19 02:35 -0700
  Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 18:06 +0200
    Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-19 18:46 -0700
      Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 05:53 +0200
      Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 06:04 +0200
      Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 06:14 +0200
  Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik Fornntp <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 01:13 -0700
    Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-20 02:12 -0700
      Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik Fornntp <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 04:26 -0700
      Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik Fornntp <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 04:38 -0700
        Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-20 14:46 -0700
          Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 17:13 -0500
            Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-20 20:25 -0700
              Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 06:44 +0200
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 06:56 +0200
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-20 22:38 -0700
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 07:47 +0200
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-21 05:45 -0700
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik Fornntp <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 07:09 -0700
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-21 11:09 -0700
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 00:06 +0200
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-21 13:41 -0700
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 00:07 +0200
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-21 18:52 -0700
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:12 +0200
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-22 00:25 -0700
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 08:15 +0200
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 10:54 -0500
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-21 11:18 -0700
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-21 11:31 -0700
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 00:10 +0200
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 13:35 -0500
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-21 12:56 -0700
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 16:26 -0500
              Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 09:24 -0500
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-21 11:14 -0700
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 13:32 -0500
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-21 13:40 -0700
                Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 16:58 -0500
          Re: Distance/potential energy ratios of planets Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 06:37 +0200

csiph-web