Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #350820
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: OK, you experts |
| Date | 2016-04-19 08:35 -0400 |
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <nf58o1$p2o$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <od6ahbt2mtek3sbf9r9dv5ugt5ii0t078o@4ax.com> <7d6e351d-b5c8-42dc-be6f-9239a0e12d9f@googlegroups.com> <1bc7686a-0f75-4a0a-80c1-a286d0c7ba2e@googlegroups.com> <nf4vi8$lhj$5@dont-email.me> <e491d930-ba61-48cb-9d15-c0192baa2fc9@googlegroups.com> |
Incubus wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 10:03:01 AM UTC, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> Incubus wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >> > On Monday, April 18, 2016 at 7:00:36 PM UTC, -hh wrote: >> >> On Monday, April 18, 2016 at 2:00:38 PM UTC-4, chrisv wrote: >> >> > vallor wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >"Hugh"'s reputation, for example, is that he is an apologist for >> >> > >extremely nasty trolls, making all sorts of machinations to try to twist >> >> > >what they do into something worthy of even being read. We're talking >> >> > >libel and defamation, not just insults. >> >> > >> >> > I recall when that fscking asshole "-hh" joined with "GreyCloud", to >> >> > attack me. I had posted links to photos of some things that I owned, >> >> > and "GreyCloud" came right-out and called me a liar - claiming that >> >> > the items in question belonged to someone else. >> >> >> >> Did he really? Cite please. >> >> >> >> Oh, and for my part, I merely pointed out that you failed miserably >> >> in actually substantiating your claim of having a BSEE, particularly >> >> since instead of posting a photo of your diploma, you instead used >> >> a couple of pics of first and second year undergraduate textbooks. >> > >> > Chrisv claimed that negative feedback is not used to stabilise an >> > amplifier circuit. That alone proves he doesn't have a BSEE. >> >> Nope. Negative feedback is not used to stabilise an amplifier circuit... >> it is used to stabilize the *output* of an amplifier circuit. > > Sheer sophistry. The output is part of the circuit from the perspective of amplifier design, an obvious example being the importance of impedance matching with valve amplification. > >> Negative >> feedback can actually cause the circuit to *produce* oscillations, unless >> damping or timing adjustments are introduced to the circuit. > > That might be so but it does not change the fact that it is wrong to say that negative feedback is not used to stabilise a circuit. You don't even comprehend what you read. >> Google it up. No, LMGTFY. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_feedback >> >> Though negative feedback has many advantages, amplifiers with feedback >> can oscillate. See the article on step response. They may even exhibit >> instability. Harry Nyquist of Bell Laboratories proposed the Nyquist >> stability criterion and the Nyquist plot that identify stable feedback >> systems, including amplifiers and control systems. > > No one said that negative feedback guarantees stability. The point > refuted is that negative feedback is not used to improve stability - a > position that is untenable. > > From the same article: '[N]egative feedback generally promotes stability. > Negative feedback tends to promote a settling to equilibrium, and reduces > the effects of perturbations. Negative feedback loops in which just the > right amount of correction is applied with optimum timing can be very > stable, accurate, and responsive'. For *output*. > Although loyalty is commendable, trying to defend chrisv's lack of > understanding is not really helping him or anyone else. It is you who don't understand. There is more than one thing here to which the word "stability" replies: output versus circuit characteristics. Chrisv's mistake is in not clarifying, in his original statement, the element being characterized by the word "stability". Of course, you clowns glom onto anything and build it up into some kind of defamation, so I am just pissing into the wind here. -- "Good afternoon, madam. How may I help you?" "Good afternoon. I'd like a FrintArms HandCannon, please." "A--? Oh, now, that's an awfully big gun for such a lovely lady. I mean, not everybody thinks ladies should carry guns at all, though I say they have a right to. But I think... I might... Let's have a look down here. I might have just the thing for you. Yes, here we are! Look at that, isn't it neat? Now that is a FrintArms product as well, but it's what's called a laser -- a light-pistol some people call them. Very small, as you see; fits easily into a pocket or bag; won't spoil the line of a jacket; and you won't feel you're lugging half a tonne of iron around with you. We do a range of matching accessories, including -- if I may say so -- a rather saucy garter holster. Wish I got to do the fitting for that! Ha -- just my little joke. And there's *even*... here we are -- this special presentation pack: gun, charged battery, charging unit, beautiful glider-hide shoulder holster with adjustable fitting and contrast stitching, and a discount on your next battery. Full instructions, of course, and a voucher for free lessons at your local gun club or range. Or there's the *special* presentation pack; it has all the other one's got but with *two* charged batteries and a night-sight, too. Here, feel that -- don't worry, it's a dummy battery -- isn't it neat? Feel how light it is? Smooth, see? No bits to stick out and catch on your clothes, *and* beautifully balanced. And of course the beauty of a laser is, there's no recoil. Because it's shooting light, you see? Beautiful gun, beautiful gun; my wife has one. Really. That's not a line, she really has. Now, I can do you that one -- with a battery and a free charge -- for ninety-five; or the presentation pack on a special offer for one-nineteen; or this, the special presentation pack, for one-forty-nine." "I'll take the special." "Sound choice, madam, *sound* choice. Now, do--?" "And a HandCannon, with the eighty-mill silencer, five GP clips, three six-five AP/wire-fl'echettes clips, two bipropellant HE clips, and a Special Projectile Pack if you have one -- the one with the embedding rounds, not the signalers. I assume the night-sight on this toy is compatible?" "Aah... yes, And how does madam wish to pay?" She slapped her credit card on the counter. "Eventually." -- Iain M. Banks, "Against a Dark Background"
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-15 19:44 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-15 12:49 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-15 14:35 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-15 18:28 -0400
Re: OK, you experts vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 00:10 +0000
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-15 18:46 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 21:50 -0400
Re: OK, you experts vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 02:30 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 22:58 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-16 06:52 -0400
Re: OK, you experts William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-16 13:30 +0100
OK, you coo coo trolls Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-16 08:42 -0400
Re: OK, you coo coo trolls Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 09:07 -0400
Re: OK, you coo coo trolls William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-16 14:23 +0100
Re: OK, you coo coo trolls Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 09:31 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 08:59 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 08:57 -0400
Re: OK, you experts vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 15:34 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-16 13:32 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-16 11:09 -0700
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 18:27 -0400
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-18 08:51 -0500
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-18 10:43 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-18 11:10 -0700
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-16 13:57 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-16 14:13 -0700
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-16 16:30 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-16 19:45 -0700
Re: OK, you experts ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 04:04 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-04-17 09:11 -0400
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-17 06:49 -0700
Re: I don't use Ubuntu, so I don't care. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-17 18:23 -0700
Re: Is every Microsoft server now a Linux server too ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-18 04:25 -0700
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 14:39 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-04-18 19:52 -0400
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-17 06:28 -0700
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-18 13:00 -0500
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-18 12:00 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 02:30 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 05:58 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 04:08 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 08:35 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 06:06 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 10:03 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 07:25 -0700
re: OK, you experts "Henry" <henry@alpha.org> - 2016-04-20 14:20 +0200
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-19 04:10 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 04:38 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 08:37 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 06:08 -0700
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-19 08:43 -0500
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-19 09:47 -0500
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-19 09:13 -0700
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-19 09:55 -0700
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-19 13:10 -0500
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-20 08:55 -0300
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-20 10:01 -0700
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-21 08:29 -0300
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-21 06:54 -0500
Re: OK, you experts owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-21 14:18 +0000
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-21 11:16 -0400
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-21 12:12 -0400
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-22 08:32 -0300
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 04:59 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 07:11 -0700
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 07:41 -0700
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-23 08:41 -0300
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-23 06:35 -0700
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-23 13:39 -0300
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-24 04:48 -0700
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-26 08:26 -0300
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-25 09:59 -0400
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-26 08:25 -0300
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-22 10:08 -0400
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-23 08:35 -0300
re: OK, you experts "KLH" <klh_man@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 16:30 +0200
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-23 08:33 -0300
Re: OK, you experts ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 17:10 +0000
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-21 12:13 -0400
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-22 08:40 -0300
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 10:09 -0400
re: OK, you experts "KLH" <klh_man@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 17:47 +0200
Re: OK, you experts Silver Slimer <peter@klown.is> - 2016-04-19 12:08 -0400
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-19 08:05 -0500
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 06:13 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Silver Slimer <peter@klown.is> - 2016-04-19 09:16 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 10:04 -0400
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 16:20 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 09:05 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-17 07:32 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 13:35 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-17 12:07 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-17 09:24 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-17 14:10 -0400
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 15:03 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 12:18 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 09:24 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 21:42 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-17 18:23 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 07:43 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 05:45 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 10:07 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 06:28 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 13:20 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 11:27 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 17:37 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 14:28 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 20:52 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 11:29 -0400
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-18 10:14 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 17:42 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 14:29 -0400
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-18 13:42 -0500
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 15:56 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 20:45 +0000
Re: OK, you experts vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-19 08:14 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-19 08:59 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 05:51 -0400
Re: OK, you experts vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-19 19:11 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 09:32 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 20:44 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Silver Slimer <peter@klown.is> - 2016-04-18 17:51 -0400
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 10:49 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-18 08:05 -0700
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 14:34 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 09:00 +0000
csiph-web