Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #349957
| From | Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Is that you, Snit? |
| Date | 2016-04-14 20:59 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nepe6p$cb1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (16 earlier) <neoob0$vrv$1@dont-email.me> <neoph9$5v3$1@dont-email.me> <nep0u9$13j$2@dont-email.me> <nep1em$3sl$1@dont-email.me> <nepca9$7n7$1@dont-email.me> |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:27:00 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-04-14 5:21 PM, Omar wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:12:51 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 2016-04-14 3:06 PM, Omar wrote: >>>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:46:03 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2016-04-14 2:40 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 4/14/16, 8:00 AM, in article neob3d$c3m$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >>>>>> <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2016-04-13 8:02 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-04-13, Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >>>>>>>>> It's sad too because some of their products are awesome. Youtube, for >>>>>>>>> one, revolutionized the Internet no matter how much people might >>>>>>>>> downplay it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> yeah, they wrote a check for $1.1 billion when they bought it. That took >>>>>>>> brains, huh.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regardless of who _created_ it, the fact remains that Google _owns_ it >>>>>>> and is therefore legally allowed to take credit for what the company >>>>>>> might have done before they took it over. In an advocate's mind, such a >>>>>>> concept is foreign but people who live in reality understand this. >>>>>>> >>>>>> They own it and have changed it. And collect the data from it. And put the >>>>>> ads on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, it is a Google tool now. No doubt. >>>>> >>>>> I find it amazing how these lying Linux losers will even attempt to >>>>> change the definition of words or manipulate the interpretation of laws >>>>> to make Linux look good. It's like someone polishing a turd and putting >>>>> a clearcoat on it in the hope that it will convince people that it's >>>>> worth something. >>>> >>>> Have you ever met an honest Linux user in any of these forums? >>>> The Linux - FOSS community attracts pathological liars by the barge. >>> >>> And I kept falling for it. >> >> We all have. > > I WANTED to believe that these were the good guys but looking back, > Microsoft has always been the one doing the good stuff. They hired my > high school's best friend and gave him a primo job which was much > deserved when NVIDIA passed on him, they gave us a great browser to > replace the horrendous Netscape for free when we needed one, they gave > free e-mail at a time when nobody could get an address anywhere but from > their ISP. Now they're giving us shitloads of online space, an online > calendar, a free upgrade to Windows 10 and even a free anti-virus in > that operating system while Linux only offers us headaches within an > ugly interface attached to gigantic losers who will only blame us if > things don't work right. The first thing you learn after installing Linux is what a bunch of liars, freaks and kooks fill the Linux community and blogosphere. That comes after you learn how much Linux sucks of course. Linux is pure crap. It always has been and if things keep progressing in a state of mass confusion it always will be. The interesting thing is that these so called Linux advocate, freaky Friday Linux zealots always seem to be hanging around like gadflies waiting to attack the person attempting to get help with Linux. These social outcasts will never admit Linux's faults, will never point out another one of their cult who lies and certainly will never tell the truth because they themselves are liars as well. And you can easily find this type of dysfunctional behavior all over the net. Post a negative Linux article and like a billion white blood cells attacking a germ they will descend upon you as if you were Lizzie Borden and just whacked their mother and father. Take a close look at these freaks. Especially those in COLA. These types didn't become kooks overnight. They were born like this and their early years, childhood, formative years, are responsible for their adult life and the path it has taken them on. What is really interesting is how they have all collected like one huge pile of sewage in the septic tank of Linux. There is a reason why Linux attracts this particular type of loser. I don't know what it is, I doubt anyone really knows, but the facts demonstrate the end result. >>> I've given Lunix so many damned chances since >>> 1994 and it has done nothing but disappoint me or fuck up my partitions >>> and hardware. >> >> As have had all of us. > > It was a lot of wasted time which I will simply never get back. The saying is "Linux is free when your time has no value". If you read any of these forums you will quickly come to the conclusion that Linux users fuck around with their computer a hell of a lot more than they use it for productive work. And while that is bad enough by itself, most of the time they are fucking around and inventing complicated solutions for problems that don't exist on other OS platforms. Linux is a huge waste of time. That's a fact. >>> Every time I was told that I did this or that wrong or >>> used the wrong distribution but even if I did EXACTLY what was >>> recommended, the issues piled up one after the other. It is complete >>> garbage and anyone who advocates it is nothing more than a lying loser. >>> They might not like the label but it's no less true. >> >> The problem is the Linux losers will always blame everything but the >> real source of the problem which is Linux. >> >> The label "Linux loser" is the perfect description of these freaks. > > There is no other way to describe a fat midget who cleans toilets for a > living like William Poaster, a man-child married to a insect-like freak > like Chris Ahlstrom and a stand-in for Jabba the Hutt like Scott Doty > (vallor). William Poaster is a janitor? That's priceless. I thought the other guy was kidding when he said William Poaster won a golden plunger award. Chris Ahlstrom is really married? I find that difficult to believe. What kind of woman would marry an extreme loser like him? I've already seen some pictures of vallor. He has a serious weight problem. He should go on a diet of 500 calories a day immediately and maybe in 2 years he will still be alive. And what is with this "oblinux" weirdo-speak gibberish he posts? Another Star Wars fanatic? Linux attracts those screwballs as well as the Star Trek nuts. Quite odd.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Linux advocates don't support their own. Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-02 18:29 -0700
Re: Linux advocates don't support their own. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-02 21:41 -0400
Re: Linux advocates don't support their own. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-04-02 22:16 -0400
Re: Linux advocates don't support their own. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-02 22:19 -0400
Is that you, Snit? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 04:00 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-03 17:23 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? "Dr. John Grubor" <dr.john.grubor@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 18:42 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-04-12 12:28 -0500
Re: Is that you, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 10:38 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-12 10:42 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <fat.linux.loser@linux.is.sh.it> - 2016-04-12 14:50 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-12 13:06 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-12 17:12 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-12 14:43 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-12 17:55 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-12 19:41 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-13 08:27 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-13 12:04 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-13 21:57 +0200
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-13 13:25 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-13 22:31 +0200
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-13 16:36 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-13 17:21 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-13 16:33 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> - 2016-04-13 19:39 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-13 17:02 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> - 2016-04-14 11:00 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 08:09 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-14 11:57 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 12:26 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-14 12:45 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-14 11:40 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 14:46 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 15:06 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-14 15:28 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 15:32 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-14 12:45 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 13:10 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 16:12 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 13:17 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 16:31 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 13:35 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 16:41 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-14 20:42 +0000
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 16:44 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 13:56 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:00 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 14:05 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:14 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 20:21 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 20:40 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-15 02:43 +0200
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 21:01 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 21:18 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 21:24 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:18 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:12 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 14:16 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:23 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 14:24 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:26 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-14 23:09 +0100
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 20:21 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:21 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 20:27 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 20:59 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 21:25 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 21:40 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-15 08:19 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 13:00 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:16 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:25 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 09:28 -0700
The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-14 05:53 +0000
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-14 01:55 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-14 07:04 -0500
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-14 12:17 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 09:36 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-14 17:48 +0100
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 13:03 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 10:46 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 14:17 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 14:55 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 12:57 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 16:08 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:15 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:19 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:04 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-04-15 01:11 +0000
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 21:25 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-15 03:35 +0200
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-15 07:18 +0000
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-15 03:39 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-16 08:15 +0200
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-16 00:04 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-16 11:27 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-17 07:29 +0200
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-17 01:48 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 19:21 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-15 09:59 +0100
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 08:27 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-14 11:55 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:08 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-14 15:34 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <fat.linux.loser@linux.is.sh.it> - 2016-04-12 14:47 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-04-12 23:45 +0000
Me Sham who is Snit is a total Ass Wipe! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 04:34 -0700
Re: Me Sham who is Snit is a total Ass Wipe! Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-13 08:29 -0400
Me Sham who is Snit is a total Ass Wipe! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 05:37 -0700
csiph-web