Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #349871
| From | Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Is that you, Snit? |
| Date | 2016-04-14 14:46 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <neoob0$vrv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <D3342564.6FC0B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <neml63$ake$2@dont-email.me> <55idnRFjAoWOQ5PKnZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com> <neob3d$c3m$1@dont-email.me> <D335323E.6FD2E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
On 2016-04-14 2:40 PM, Snit wrote: > On 4/14/16, 8:00 AM, in article neob3d$c3m$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" > <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: > >> On 2016-04-13 8:02 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >>> On 2016-04-13, Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >>>> It's sad too because some of their products are awesome. Youtube, for >>>> one, revolutionized the Internet no matter how much people might >>>> downplay it. >>> >>> yeah, they wrote a check for $1.1 billion when they bought it. That took >>> brains, huh.... >> >> Regardless of who _created_ it, the fact remains that Google _owns_ it >> and is therefore legally allowed to take credit for what the company >> might have done before they took it over. In an advocate's mind, such a >> concept is foreign but people who live in reality understand this. >> > They own it and have changed it. And collect the data from it. And put the > ads on it. > > Yes, it is a Google tool now. No doubt. I find it amazing how these lying Linux losers will even attempt to change the definition of words or manipulate the interpretation of laws to make Linux look good. It's like someone polishing a turd and putting a clearcoat on it in the hope that it will convince people that it's worth something. -- Silver Slimer
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Linux advocates don't support their own. Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-02 18:29 -0700
Re: Linux advocates don't support their own. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-02 21:41 -0400
Re: Linux advocates don't support their own. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-04-02 22:16 -0400
Re: Linux advocates don't support their own. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-02 22:19 -0400
Is that you, Snit? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 04:00 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-03 17:23 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? "Dr. John Grubor" <dr.john.grubor@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 18:42 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-04-12 12:28 -0500
Re: Is that you, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 10:38 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-12 10:42 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <fat.linux.loser@linux.is.sh.it> - 2016-04-12 14:50 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-12 13:06 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-12 17:12 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-12 14:43 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-12 17:55 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-12 19:41 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-13 08:27 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-13 12:04 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-13 21:57 +0200
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-13 13:25 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-13 22:31 +0200
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-13 16:36 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-13 17:21 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-13 16:33 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> - 2016-04-13 19:39 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-13 17:02 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> - 2016-04-14 11:00 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 08:09 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-14 11:57 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 12:26 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-14 12:45 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-14 11:40 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 14:46 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 15:06 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-14 15:28 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 15:32 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-14 12:45 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 13:10 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 16:12 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 13:17 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 16:31 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 13:35 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 16:41 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-14 20:42 +0000
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 16:44 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 13:56 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:00 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 14:05 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:14 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 20:21 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 20:40 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-15 02:43 +0200
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 21:01 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 21:18 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 21:24 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:18 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:12 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 14:16 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:23 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 14:24 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:26 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-14 23:09 +0100
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 20:21 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:21 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 20:27 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 20:59 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 21:25 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 21:40 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-15 08:19 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 13:00 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:16 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:25 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 09:28 -0700
The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-14 05:53 +0000
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-14 01:55 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-14 07:04 -0500
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-14 12:17 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 09:36 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-14 17:48 +0100
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 13:03 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 10:46 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 14:17 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 14:55 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 12:57 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 16:08 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:15 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-14 17:19 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:04 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-04-15 01:11 +0000
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 21:25 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-15 03:35 +0200
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-15 07:18 +0000
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-15 03:39 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-16 08:15 +0200
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-16 00:04 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-16 11:27 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-17 07:29 +0200
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-17 01:48 -0400
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 19:21 -0700
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-15 09:59 +0100
Re: The Slimer kook is back...and nymshifting Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 08:27 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-14 11:55 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 17:08 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-14 15:34 -0700
Re: Is that you, Snit? Silver Slimer <fat.linux.loser@linux.is.sh.it> - 2016-04-12 14:47 -0400
Re: Is that you, Snit? "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-04-12 23:45 +0000
Me Sham who is Snit is a total Ass Wipe! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 04:34 -0700
Re: Me Sham who is Snit is a total Ass Wipe! Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-13 08:29 -0400
Me Sham who is Snit is a total Ass Wipe! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 05:37 -0700
csiph-web