Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #381088
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. |
| Date | 2016-04-07 08:24 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <ne5n2r$su6$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <nd372p$5ej$1@gioia.aioe.org> <dlmikvFepjkU1@mid.individual.net> <3k5efblgqc9p1vqnqlf5eqeplcpggvq6i0@4ax.com> <ndbg9j$vhc$2@gioia.aioe.org> <0hdjfb16umvv9jv6rr9s1dujqkda7img6t@4ax.com> |
On 3/28/2016 5:58 PM, HGW wrote: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:49:30 -0500, Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 3/26/2016 6:11 PM, HGW wrote: > >>>>>> But that's not equivalent to your original claim. >>>>> >>>>> what claim? >>>> >>>> The claim that "According to several Einstein worshippers a force >>>> applied to an antiparticle will accelerate that particle in the >>>> direction opposite to that of the applied force vector." >> >> That claim is not true. > > That is what Harnagel claimed...and you agreed with him. I don't think so. Note the confusion below. > >>> That is true. It happened. Harnagel, supported by Draper assumed that if a >>> positron had negative mass it would be deflected by a field in the same >>> direction as would an electron. >> >> And supported by me as well. This claim is true. >> >> You see the difference between the two claims? > > There is no difference. Of course there is. > The only force is the electrical one. You are claiming > that the applied electrical force would cause an acceleration towards the force > if the mass was negative. Heck no. > >>> >>>> Sylvia. >>> > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-03-25 22:23 +1100
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-26 15:48 +1100
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-03-27 10:11 +1100
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-27 13:11 +1100
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-03-27 20:40 +1100
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 09:49 -0500
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-28 21:53 +0200
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-03-29 09:54 +1100
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-03-29 09:58 +1100
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 08:24 -0500
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-08 17:18 +1000
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-08 08:40 -0700
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <HGW@....> - 2016-04-09 08:36 +1000
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-08 20:38 -0700
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <HGW@....> - 2016-04-09 19:54 +1000
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-09 05:29 -0700
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-10 18:07 +1000
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-10 06:04 -0700
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-10 19:46 -0700
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-11 05:14 -0700
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-12 08:03 +1000
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-11 15:56 -0700
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-12 19:48 +1000
Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-12 05:29 -0700
csiph-web