Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #381131

Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine.

From	HGW <hw@...>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine.
Date	2016-04-08 17:18 +1000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<ne7lvd$1tld$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <dlmikvFepjkU1@mid.individual.net> <3k5efblgqc9p1vqnqlf5eqeplcpggvq6i0@4ax.com> <ndbg9j$vhc$2@gioia.aioe.org> <0hdjfb16umvv9jv6rr9s1dujqkda7img6t@4ax.com> <ne5n2r$su6$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On 07/04/16 23:24, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 3/28/2016 5:58 PM, HGW wrote:

>>>>> The claim that "According to several Einstein worshippers a force
>>>>> applied to an antiparticle will accelerate that particle in the
>>>>> direction opposite to that of the applied force vector."
>>>
>>> That claim is not true.

Harnagel definitely said that if a positron had negative mass, it would 
be deflected in the same direction as an electron by an electric field.

I pointed out the impossibility of that.

>>>
>>> And supported by me as well. This claim is true.
>>>
>>> You see the difference between the two claims?
>>
>> There is no difference.
>
> Of course there is.
>
>> The only force is the electrical one. You are claiming
>> that the applied electrical force would cause an acceleration towards
>> the force
>> if the mass was negative.
>
> Heck no.

Then what properties might 'negative' mass possess? The word negative' 
itself gives the wrong impression.
A positive and a negative mass could conceivably unite to form zero mass 
yet still be affected by gravity or any other applied force in the same 
way as would two identical masses.
....OR, maybe inertial mass can be different from gravitational mass 
under certain circumstances. I already suggested that possibility as an 
option IF the gravitational bending of light DID actually turn out to be 
double that predicted by Newton...(which is extremely unlikely).

Thread

Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-03-25 22:23 +1100
  Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-26 15:48 +1100
    Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-03-27 10:11 +1100
      Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-27 13:11 +1100
        Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-03-27 20:40 +1100
      Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 09:49 -0500
        Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-28 21:53 +0200
          Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-03-29 09:54 +1100
        Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-03-29 09:58 +1100
          Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 08:24 -0500
            Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-08 17:18 +1000
              Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-08 08:40 -0700
                Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <HGW@....> - 2016-04-09 08:36 +1000
                Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-08 20:38 -0700
                Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <HGW@....> - 2016-04-09 19:54 +1000
                Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-09 05:29 -0700
                Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-10 18:07 +1000
                Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-10 06:04 -0700
                Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-10 19:46 -0700
                Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-11 05:14 -0700
                Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-12 08:03 +1000
                Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-11 15:56 -0700
                Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-12 19:48 +1000
                Re: The Dingleberry Anti-Gravity, Perpetual Motion Machine. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-12 05:29 -0700

csiph-web