Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney.

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney.
Date	2016-04-03 06:23 +0000
Organization	The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID	<ndqctd$f4m$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.1{7.02P.Seattle.2016}> <ndp51o$12e$4@pcls7.std.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.2{0.19P.Seattle.2016}> <ndq89p$l4t$1@pcls7.std.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.2{10.33P.Seattle.2016}>

Show all headers | View raw

Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> writes:

>Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney.

>The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 
>tells us that you can't simultaneously know 
>the (pseudo)singularity's position and momentum so precisely.

>"Stephen Hawking: 'There are no black holes'"
>http://www.nature.com/news/stephen-hawking-there-are-no-black-holes-1.14583

That article doesn't even mention the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
Hawking may disbelieve in black holes, and maybe he's right, but his
arguments don't involve the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

So once again: Why do you say black holes violate the Heisenberg 
Uncertainty Principle?

Thread

Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 12:58 -0500
  p.e.a noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 13:47 -0700
  Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-04-01 14:02 -0700
    Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 16:20 -0500
    Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-01 23:15 +0000
      Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-02 01:49 +0000
        Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 20:00 -0700
        Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-02 19:03 +0000
          Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-03 05:04 +0000
            Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 02:01 -0400
            Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-03 06:23 +0000
              Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney. xxein1@att.net - 2016-04-03 10:54 -0700
            Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-03 14:05 -0700
              Re: Loop Quantum Gravity. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-05 14:07 -0700
      Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 22:31 -0400
  Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-04-01 17:33 -0400
    Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-04-02 12:26 -0400
      Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-04-04 08:54 -0400
  Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-03 20:13 -0500

csiph-web