Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused

From	Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused
Date	2016-03-26 17:13 +0100
Organization	Good company
Message-ID	<nd6c95$s25$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <74b40c6b-b632-433f-8aeb-e8ec2e0eb571@googlegroups.com> <nd2lnf$bpl$1@dont-email.me> <e91ae499-fa03-4bee-b115-57b69d6090e4@googlegroups.com> <nd5kc6$ar2$1@dont-email.me> <d7f24f98-fe30-4eae-a36c-725b5e6e356f@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Dne 26/03/2016 v 17:04 James McGinn napsal(a):
> On Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 2:25:29 AM UTC-7, Poutnik wrote:
>> Dne 25/03/2016 v 13:10 James McGinn napsal(a):
>>> On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 11:30:10 PM UTC-7, Poutnik wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> Hydrogen bonds are not able to make H2O molecule linear.
>>>
>>> True.  But do you know why?
>>
>> It would be sad if I did not.
>>
>>>> Liquid or supercritical CO2 is used as a polar solvent,
>>>> e.g. for extraction of polar caffeine from coffee.
>>>
>>> Interesting.
>>>
>> And illustrating your statement about meaningless is not relevant.
>>
>> Being polar means either to have atoms with partial charges,
>> either to be donor or acceptor of electron pair.
> 
> Much ado about nothing.  I discuss the distinction in my paper.  Methane has polar bonds but is not a dipole.  H2O is a dipole because of its asymmetry.  

Polarity of methane bonds is very weak.

Being dipole as result of assymetry is self obvious.
If you knew more , you would know hydrogen bonds
cannot significantly change geometry of water bonds.

It is seen even in ice structure,

As you ignore most of physics in your posts,
potential of interest of your papers is very low.

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

Thread

Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 20:11 -0700
  Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 07:30 +0100
    Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 05:10 -0700
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 10:25 +0100
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Bojana Kudryavtseva <bojkud@rtyn56h67i.org> - 2016-03-26 10:33 +0000
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 10:36 -0400
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-27 05:04 +0200
              Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-28 05:12 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-28 21:37 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Ewan <iq49j@noemail.edu> - 2016-03-28 19:52 +0000
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-30 06:38 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-29 20:02 +0200
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:04 -0700
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 17:13 +0100
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:36 -0700
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 23:54 -0700
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:39 +0100
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:10 -0700
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 14:02 -0700
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-29 18:49 -0500
  Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-25 18:20 +0000
    Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 13:04 -0700
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-26 18:05 +0000
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:19 -0700
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-27 05:09 +0000

csiph-web