Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #563847
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day |
| Date | 2016-03-20 14:16 +0100 |
| Organization | Good company |
| Message-ID | <ncm7kr$rc3$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <40163cf1-f624-49ca-a1d1-03fa11028b33@googlegroups.com> <614f6d7a02313dbc6019e087911b5a08@dizum.com> <c61aa670-7cca-4398-a3d4-82b74d32e899@googlegroups.com> <nclobf$5dg$1@dont-email.me> <ccbd3975-00b3-4251-aab3-6477601659cb@googlegroups.com> |
Dne 20/03/2016 v 10:15 James McGinn napsal(a): > On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 1:55:12 AM UTC-7, Poutnik wrote: >> Dne 20/03/2016 v 08:41 James McGinn napsal(a): >>> On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 12:09:55 AM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>> >>>>> The notion that a plasma can come into existence under wind shear >>>>> conditions is implausible. >>>> >>>> It is impossible, Jim. It doesn't happen. You have no proof that it >>>> happens. >>> >>> You have no proof that it doesn't. >>> >> >> You have skipped the first step >> of proofing to yourself it should happen. >> You just think it should, what is not sufficient. >> >> What you have proven is your misunderstanding >> of physics of gases, >> making funny statements about the convection. >> >> Thermal collisions of air molecules are much more energetic >> than collisions via macro air movement. Random speed of molecules >> is frequently 5-20times higher than organized speed >> of air masses within tornadoes. >> >> Yet not even thermal collisions produce plasma. >> >> Ions in air are produced by radioactive decay of radon >> and collisions with showers of secondary particles >> of Solar wind and cosmic rays. > > The plasma of my scenario requires you to have a sophisticated understanding of hydrogen bonding. Do a search for Hydrogen Bonding Neutralized H2O Polarity James McGinn > Hydrogen Bonding Neutralized H2O Polarity has nothing to do with sophisticated understanding of hydrogen bonding. It is just your systematic ignoring of physics and evidences in all of your hypothesis, being nothing but floating air castles of your fantasies. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 21:10 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 07:59 +0100
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 00:41 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 09:55 +0100
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 02:15 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 14:16 +0100
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 09:10 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 19:22 +0100
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 11:38 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 18:59 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 10:22 +0200
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 07:11 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 18:15 +0200
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 10:56 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-09 08:00 +0200
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-09 08:15 +0200
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 19:00 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 11:21 +0200
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 14:30 -0500
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 08:19 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-30 05:26 +0200
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 16:50 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-01 07:24 +0200
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 23:08 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-01 19:29 +0200
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 13:00 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-02 07:44 +0200
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 23:01 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-02 18:08 +0200
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-02 10:23 -0600
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 22:27 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-02 17:58 +0200
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 10:27 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-03 07:29 +0200
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 00:38 -0700
Re: I will take implausible over impossible any day Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-04 07:48 +0200
csiph-web