Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #563216
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN |
| Date | 2016-03-17 14:40 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ncf82s$ruu$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <ncep7l$1s79$1@gioia.aioe.org> <86d27681-2bb6-4be9-9c68-fb465fbb68b4@googlegroups.com> <ddd5c441-bac7-421d-9eaf-c88f65e429b0@googlegroups.com> <e1436473-65fe-4ae8-8967-f7a388b3d398@googlegroups.com> <45389935-c747-4a17-a42a-6aca6da903be@googlegroups.com> |
"Mahipal" Virdy <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote: Harlow Campbell "HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote, that... > Maple Loops says > BJ is free to believe whatever he wants, despite your lack of > understanding or comprehending what exactly BJ may reason or think. > Harlow wrote: > I agree. BJ has the right to believe in ghosts, ESP, haunted houses, > god, aliens, and any other kooky ideas. I reserve the right to make > fun of him. > What's wrong with that? > Virdy wrote: Glad you HVAC asked. Now sit down and listen Soldier soldier SOLDIER! Usenet is not here for you HVAC to abuse others. Period. BitchHVAC! Usenet is a discussion group, all are generally welcomed here, as long as one stays on-topic. Yes HVAC, I mean you, look up what on-topic means. Got Dictionary?! Everyday you HVAC post the same crap Crap CRAP. Albeit in a nice new clean thread. Who reads or knows history, right?! Since nobody dares, seems to me, challenges you, per my experience reading here, you HVAC just encourage more worthless trolls to dilute the quality of this what once was a fantastic science/physics discussion newsgroup. Lose your Send key, HVAC. Multiple choice question (MCQ), since HVAC your brain works only that way: a) You HVAC are not being funny Funny FUNNY! b) You HVAC are a Usenet Bully, obviously. c) You HVAC are a Lonely Troll, hurts don't it?! d) You HVAC see the dead ghosts of many 8 year old Vietnamese girls. e) The longest answer is almost always correct in MCQs. f) All of the above and then some. -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: No more kid gloves, destroy the Bullies!” > hanson wrote: Virdy, the underlaying reason in your MCQ is missing. The answer is hidden in your hint that "Usenet is not here for you HVAC to abuse others." > If you have followed the recent tripe in HVAC's s.p blog you must have seen that HVAC bitterly regrets, is distraught and clinically depressed because he can't deal and much less accept the fact that all of HVAC's daughters and his son, have grown up and now have left the home, which created a huge vacum in HVAC's persona. > HVAC WAS the undisputed king over them for 25 years. Now with all of his subjects gone they have left poor Harlow de-throned and alone and lonesome. > HVAC now being a King without subjects, desperately looks for Ersatz children, which he can boss & bully around again, re-establishing his kinkdom, and HVAC believes to have found a set of such peasants in form of the posters in s.p. > Unfortunately, those s.p. folks behave far worse then HVAC own kids did during their most rebellious teen years.. and that galls the scepter wielding HVAC to no end ... as HVAC begins to realize that HVAC's method of Ersatz parenting is being given the finger from all directions, day-in and day-out, no matter what HVAC says.... Pity, but IROTFLMAO... ahahahahahaa.. > Talk to you later, Virdy. > PS: The mental cripple <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier> is calling again to be administered to with badly needed <http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy>
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Search for New Physics at CERN Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 21:22 -0500
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 23:10 -0400
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-16 22:24 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 02:57 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 03:47 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-17 08:34 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 08:56 -0500
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 07:33 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 09:37 -0500
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 07:53 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-17 15:32 +0000
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:39 -0500
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 13:07 -0400
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:25 -0500
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-03-17 16:12 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 21:12 -0400
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 21:09 -0500
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-03-18 10:51 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:58 -0500
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-03-18 11:27 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 00:39 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 08:43 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 11:02 -0500
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 09:22 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:45 -0400
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 11:58 -0500
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:08 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 13:02 -0400
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:24 -0500
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:56 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 11:12 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 11:23 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-17 18:41 +0000
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:14 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:47 -0400
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 14:37 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-17 14:40 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 14:50 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 20:57 -0400
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-17 21:51 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-17 22:42 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:20 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:09 -0400
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:48 -0400
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:06 -0400
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:40 -0400
Re: BenJacoby and JohnSefton wear blinders. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 18:03 -0400
Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 02:50 -0700
Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 07:19 -0700
Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-18 14:45 +0000
Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 09:55 -0500
Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 07:56 -0700
Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:07 -0700
Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:14 -0700
Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:37 -0700
Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-18 15:38 +0000
Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-18 15:35 +0000
Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 10:13 -0500
Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. xxein1@att.net - 2016-03-18 16:52 -0700
Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:34 -0500
Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:02 -0400
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 20:48 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 01:59 -0400
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 09:36 -0500
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:03 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:13 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 10:47 -0500
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:54 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 07:54 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 08:17 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 08:36 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:55 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:19 -0500
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:58 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-16 21:11 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:36 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 21:13 -0400
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 21:10 -0500
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-17 20:55 -0700
Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 20:35 -0700
csiph-web