Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #563216

Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN

From "hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN
Date 2016-03-17 14:40 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ncf82s$ruu$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (12 earlier) <ncep7l$1s79$1@gioia.aioe.org> <86d27681-2bb6-4be9-9c68-fb465fbb68b4@googlegroups.com> <ddd5c441-bac7-421d-9eaf-c88f65e429b0@googlegroups.com> <e1436473-65fe-4ae8-8967-f7a388b3d398@googlegroups.com> <45389935-c747-4a17-a42a-6aca6da903be@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


"Mahipal" Virdy <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:

Harlow Campbell "HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote, that...
> Maple Loops says
> BJ is free to believe whatever he wants, despite your lack of
> understanding or comprehending what exactly BJ may reason or think.
>
Harlow wrote:
> I agree. BJ has the right to believe in ghosts, ESP, haunted houses,
> god, aliens, and any other kooky ideas. I reserve the right to make
> fun of him.
> What's wrong with that?
>
Virdy wrote:
Glad you HVAC asked. Now sit down and listen Soldier soldier SOLDIER!

Usenet is not here for you HVAC to abuse others. Period. BitchHVAC!

Usenet is a discussion group, all are generally welcomed here, as long
as one stays on-topic. Yes HVAC, I mean you, look up what on-topic
means. Got Dictionary?! Everyday you HVAC post the same crap Crap CRAP.
Albeit in a nice new clean thread. Who reads or knows history, right?!

Since nobody dares, seems to me, challenges you, per my experience
reading here, you HVAC just encourage more worthless trolls to dilute
the quality of this what once was a fantastic science/physics
discussion newsgroup. Lose your Send key, HVAC.

Multiple choice question (MCQ), since HVAC your brain works only that way:
a) You HVAC are not being funny Funny FUNNY!
b) You HVAC are a Usenet Bully, obviously.
c) You HVAC are a Lonely Troll, hurts don't it?!
d) You HVAC see the dead ghosts of many 8 year old Vietnamese girls.
e) The longest answer is almost always correct in MCQs.
f) All of the above and then some.

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: No more kid gloves, destroy the Bullies!”
>
hanson wrote:
Virdy, the underlaying reason in your MCQ is missing.
The answer is hidden in your hint that "Usenet is not
here for you HVAC to abuse others."
>
If you have followed the recent tripe in HVAC's s.p blog
you must have seen  that HVAC bitterly regrets, is
distraught and clinically depressed because he can't
deal and much less accept the fact that all of HVAC's
daughters and his son, have grown up and now have
left the home, which created a huge vacum in HVAC's
persona.
>
HVAC WAS the undisputed king over them for 25 years.
Now with all of his subjects gone they have left poor
Harlow de-throned and alone and lonesome.
>
HVAC now being a King without subjects, desperately
looks for Ersatz children, which he can boss & bully
around again, re-establishing his kinkdom, and HVAC
believes to have found a set of such peasants in form
of the posters in s.p.
>
Unfortunately, those s.p. folks behave far worse then
HVAC own kids did during their most rebellious teen
years.. and that galls the scepter wielding HVAC to
no end ... as HVAC begins to realize  that HVAC's
method of Ersatz parenting is being given the finger
from all directions, day-in and day-out, no matter what
HVAC says.... Pity, but IROTFLMAO... ahahahahahaa..
>
Talk to you later, Virdy.
>
PS:
The mental cripple <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>
is calling again to be administered to with badly needed
<http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy>





Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The Search for New Physics at CERN Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 21:22 -0500
  Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 23:10 -0400
    Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-16 22:24 -0700
      Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 02:57 -0700
        Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 03:47 -0700
          Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-17 08:34 -0700
        Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 08:56 -0500
          Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 07:33 -0700
            Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 09:37 -0500
              Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 07:53 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-17 15:32 +0000
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:39 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 13:07 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:25 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-03-17 16:12 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 21:12 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 21:09 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-03-18 10:51 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:58 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-03-18 11:27 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 00:39 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 08:43 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 11:02 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 09:22 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:45 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 11:58 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:08 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 13:02 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:24 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:56 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 11:12 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 11:23 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-17 18:41 +0000
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:14 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:47 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 14:37 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-17 14:40 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 14:50 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 20:57 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-17 21:51 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-17 22:42 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:20 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:09 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:48 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:06 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:40 -0400
                Re: BenJacoby and JohnSefton wear blinders. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 18:03 -0400
                Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 02:50 -0700
                Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 07:19 -0700
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-18 14:45 +0000
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 09:55 -0500
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 07:56 -0700
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:07 -0700
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:14 -0700
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:37 -0700
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-18 15:38 +0000
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-18 15:35 +0000
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 10:13 -0500
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. xxein1@att.net - 2016-03-18 16:52 -0700
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:34 -0500
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:02 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 20:48 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 01:59 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 09:36 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:03 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:13 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 10:47 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:54 -0700
            Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 07:54 -0700
              Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 08:17 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 08:36 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:55 -0700
            Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:19 -0500
          Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:58 -0700
  Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-16 21:11 -0700
  Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:36 -0700
    Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 21:13 -0400
    Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 21:10 -0500
    Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-17 20:55 -0700
  Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 20:35 -0700

csiph-web