Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN
Date	2016-03-17 08:56 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nced2j$15ke$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<IOqdnbcHWbJ6iXfLnZ2dnUU7-TGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <lepGy.3527$nw.613@fx37.iad> <ncdf2f$6v0$1@dont-email.me> <ad42750b-6551-4737-8bb7-55ffc8e4a61f@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/17/2016 4:57 AM, john wrote:
> Hanson said
> "
> Sadly, most of them fall victim to unreal notions of  curved &
> expanding space, spacetime, space-like, tim-like and point-
> like masses, .. and becomes Einstein Dingleberries who do
> obsessively proselytize the worship Albert's Sphincter. Pity.
> "
> Like Odd.
> Like HVAC.
> Like Michael.
>
> These are the DENIERS.
> They deny that ANYTHING is wrong.

That's right.

There's nothing wrong.

You see, you hold that there is some law of nature that says "All things 
MUST have shape, structure, internal parts, volume." You never even ask 
whether such a claim is really true or not. Instead, whenever something 
comes along that runs counter to your belief, you just say, "Well, 
that's it, something's wrong with that idea."

It never seems to occur to you that nature doesn't give a rat's ass 
whether you think all things MUST have shape, structure, internal parts, 
volume. Nature is what it is, and there is NO LAW dreamed up by man that 
is holy. None.

> Big Pharma = "could cause death" because
> they're sticking atoms together with
> incomplete (i.e. WRONG) knowledge.
>
> Point-like = "how stupid are you?"
>
> Odd- "science can make big messes so
> why shouldn't it?"

Yes, science can make big messes. So does every single fucking human 
venture ever. So why do you single out science as failing your notion of 
perfection?

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

The Search for New Physics at CERN Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 21:22 -0500
  Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 23:10 -0400
    Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-16 22:24 -0700
      Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 02:57 -0700
        Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 03:47 -0700
          Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-17 08:34 -0700
        Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 08:56 -0500
          Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 07:33 -0700
            Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 09:37 -0500
              Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 07:53 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-17 15:32 +0000
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:39 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 13:07 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:25 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-03-17 16:12 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 21:12 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 21:09 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-03-18 10:51 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:58 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-03-18 11:27 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 00:39 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 08:43 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 11:02 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 09:22 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:45 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 11:58 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:08 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 13:02 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:24 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:56 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 11:12 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 11:23 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-17 18:41 +0000
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:14 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:47 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 14:37 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-17 14:40 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 14:50 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 20:57 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-17 21:51 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-17 22:42 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:20 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:09 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:48 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:06 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:40 -0400
                Re: BenJacoby and JohnSefton wear blinders. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 18:03 -0400
                Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 02:50 -0700
                Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 07:19 -0700
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-18 14:45 +0000
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 09:55 -0500
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 07:56 -0700
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:07 -0700
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:14 -0700
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:37 -0700
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-18 15:38 +0000
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-18 15:35 +0000
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 10:13 -0500
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. xxein1@att.net - 2016-03-18 16:52 -0700
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:34 -0500
                Re: Nature is omnipotent, omniscient and eternal. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:02 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 20:48 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 01:59 -0400
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 09:36 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:03 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:13 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 10:47 -0500
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:54 -0700
            Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 07:54 -0700
              Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 08:17 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 08:36 -0700
                Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:55 -0700
            Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:19 -0500
          Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:58 -0700
  Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-16 21:11 -0700
  Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:36 -0700
    Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 21:13 -0400
    Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 21:10 -0500
    Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-17 20:55 -0700
  Re: The Search for New Physics at CERN "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 20:35 -0700

csiph-web