Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #562866

Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought

From "hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought
Date 2016-03-16 10:24 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ncc4mo$no0$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <8JGdncG8ddRoLnXLnZ2dnUU7-V2dnZ2d@giganews.com><ncadpd$vm$1@dont-email.me> <ncbavi0khm@news7.newsguy.com>

Show all headers | View raw


"Fabian Russell" <root@localhost.localdomain> aka
"Fagie Bodaisky", is a NY kike, who lives off the
tips he gets from being a rest-room attendant in a
NY Bath house for gay Jews.
>
Then Fagie bragged to augment his meager income 
by Fagie being a "photographer" who conducted 
nefarious acts against the US Infrastructure that
landed Fagie Bodaisky on a FBI watch list.
>
Fagie Bodaisky is also one of those many Einstein 
Dingleberries who read  Sci.Am. and then parrot buzz 
words about which Fagie knows less then a dog that
barks into the night at a distant noise he knows 
nothing about,  as can be seen when...
>
hanson wrote:
>> This k-tuple math conjectures then makes Einstein 
>> Relativity out to be totally USELESS for any practical 
>> purpose in the real world and it descends into the  
>> reams of philosophy where religious undertones
>> arise that manifest themselves by Einstein Dingleberries
>> who worship  Albert's Sphincter... 
> 
Fagie wrote:
> Radar guns -- relativistic doppler effect
> cathode ray tubes -- relativistic electron velocity
> General magnetism -- relativity in the flesh
> mass-energy equivalence (E=mc^2) -- nuclear energy power plants
> These common, everyday applications of relativity completely
> overturn your outlandish assertion.
>
hanson wrote:
That then is Fagie's delusional world of religiously
worshipping Einstein's Sphincter, wherewith a math 
description miraculously produces the above gizmos.
>
Every normal kid though knows that NONE of Fagie's
mentioned items require any SR/GR, not for their 
conception, nor their production, nor their manufacturing
nor their operation/s, nor their testing. Fagie has no
idea how R&D or Mfgr. works.... ahahahahaha...
>
Fagie mindlessly parroted on & wrote:
> Global positioning -- both SR and GR *must* be a 
> foundation to the technology
>
hanson wrote:
Fagie seeks refuge by referring to Ashby's tripe of "Relativity 
in the Global Positioning Systemin which it took Kike Ashby 
39 questionable & tortured steps to get to the 38 usec delay, 
when & while any high school student or engineer, can glean,
 for this particular situation, in 1 fell swoop, in ONE SINGLE 
STEP, in good, old Newtonian ways, and show that
>
|||||  ----  m_e/h * 2G/c^2 *86400  =  38...  microsec/day  ---- 
|||||  ---     m_e/h * 2G/c *86400  =  11.2... km drift/day   ---- 

where m_e = mass of earth and h = the satellite's height
above the earth surface. Correction are done by standard
industrial ways by classical methods devoid of any SR/GR.
< http://tinyurl.com/622an2>   or < http://tinyurl.com/57asbg>
>>
>>
||||| ---- GPS NEVER NEEDED neither SR nor GR ---- 
||||| not for its design, manufacturing, testing nor operations.
||||| ----------GPS was in operation  LONG before -------- 
|||||   Einstein Dingleberries came along to nuzzle into the
|||||   show, hoping to get some credit away from Newton.
>
But Fagie, the gay Einstein Dingleberry is too fanatical
in his worship of Einstein's sphincter, to see that he is
upfront & center, spreading his & hysteria with his
own and loud <http://tinyurl.com/Proof-of-Relativity
 
hanson wrote:
>> and Einstein's crap descends into the  reams of 
>> philosophy where religious undertones arise
>>
Fagie got irate and wondered:
> Where the fuck does this gibberish arise?
> Your entire post, in spite of its colloquial tone, is entirely
> philosophical in nature.  For those without a leg to stand on,
> philosophy is the only crutch.
>
hanson wrote:
Fagie, you are projection again. What you just said is 
exactly what you always do,since it is compulsively forced 
upon and out of you due to your obsession of religiously 
worshipping Albert's sphincter.., which is so fanatical that...
> 
Fagie made a Freudian slip & wrote:
> Incidentally, the correct term is "realm" and not "ream."
> The word "ream" refers to the act of inserting objects into
> the ass.  I suppose the unconscious typo reveals Fagie's
> true orientation . LOL!  What a faggot loser that Fagie is!
>
hanson wrote:
Fagie, thanks for he laughs though ... ahahahahahahnson

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 20:16 -0500
  Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-15 18:46 -0700
    Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-03-16 10:02 +0000
      Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-16 10:24 -0700
  Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought Jamie M <jmorken@shaw.ca> - 2016-03-15 19:50 -0700
    Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 14:11 -0700
  Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought David Bernier <david250@videotron.ca> - 2016-03-16 19:02 -0400
    Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-16 23:38 -0800

csiph-web