Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #562794
| From | Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought |
| Date | 2016-03-16 10:02 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <ncbavi0khm@news7.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <8JGdncG8ddRoLnXLnZ2dnUU7-V2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <ncadpd$vm$1@dont-email.me> |
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:46:55 -0700, hanson wrote: > > which IOW makes Einstein;'s Relativity out to be totally > USELESS for any practical purpose in the real world > Radar guns -- relativistic doppler effect cathode ray tubes -- relativistic electron velocity Global positioning -- both SR and GR *must* be a foundation to the technology General magnetism -- relativity in the flesh mass-energy equivalence (E=mc^2) -- nuclear energy power plants These common, everyday applications of relativity completely overturn your outlandish assertion. > > and it > descends into the reams of philosophy where religious undertones > arise > Where the fuck does this gibberish arise? Your entire post, in spite of its colloquial tone, is entirely philosophical in nature. For those without a leg to stand on, philosophy is the only crutch. Incidentally, the correct term is "realm" and not "ream." The word "ream" refers to the act of inserting objects into the ass. I suppose the unconscious typo reveals your true orientation. LOL! What a faggot loser!
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 20:16 -0500
Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-15 18:46 -0700
Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-03-16 10:02 +0000
Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-16 10:24 -0700
Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought Jamie M <jmorken@shaw.ca> - 2016-03-15 19:50 -0700
Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 14:11 -0700
Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought David Bernier <david250@videotron.ca> - 2016-03-16 19:02 -0400
Re: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-16 23:38 -0800
csiph-web