Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #194595
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" |
| Date | 2026-07-19 22:47 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nc4reqFiq3fU5@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <113ggqd$3p4tc$1@dont-email.me> <7aOcnRu6-PYsY8b3nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@supernews.com> <113hdo3$2043$1@dont-email.me> <113hv66$3j5bp$9@dont-email.me> <113ipih$emjq$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
(advocacy groups removed)
On 2026-07-19 17:13, Paul wrote:
> Would a Linux user actually accept a commercial Linux distro
> being placed on their hardware ?
Sometimes.
It guarantees that it will work with Linux. I would try it, then if not
happy, make a backup, then install my own.
>
> They would just as soon buy a Windows machine, erase the HDD,
> install one of five hundred Linux distros on it.
Better install with no system, like this Lenovo laptop.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-07-18 14:31 -0400
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-19 03:08 +0800
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Nick Charles <none@none.none> - 2026-07-18 22:31 +0000
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-07-18 18:39 -0400
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-07-18 22:45 -0400
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-07-19 08:43 +0100
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-07-19 11:13 -0400
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-19 22:47 +0200
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-07-22 18:01 +0100
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2026-07-19 07:40 +0000
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-07-19 10:22 -0400
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-20 00:59 -0700
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-07-19 13:25 -0400
csiph-web