Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #194571
| From | Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.comp.os.windows-11, comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" |
| Date | 2026-07-18 22:45 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <113hdo3$2043$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <113ggqd$3p4tc$1@dont-email.me> <7aOcnRu6-PYsY8b3nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@supernews.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Sat, 7/18/2026 6:31 PM, Nick Charles wrote:
>
> I say "desperate and last ditch" because Windows is tanking. As of June
> Windows is down to 53% of desktop share in the U.S. Macs are now 30% and
> Linux/Chrome is now around 16%.
Watch where you get your statistics from.
https://www.windowslatest.com/2026/07/12/no-windows-did-not-fall-below-60-market-share-or-lose-15-points-to-linux/
"I downloaded the data from StatCounter, and we found that an operating system labeled
“Unknown” suddenly accounted for 21.45% of the desktop market. This category could include
any device where the browser’s user agent is modified, unavailable, or cannot be correctly
identified by StatCounter.
"
It's hard to say exactly what they've been doing with the collected data.
Paul
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-07-18 14:31 -0400
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-19 03:08 +0800
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Nick Charles <none@none.none> - 2026-07-18 22:31 +0000
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-07-18 18:39 -0400
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-07-18 22:45 -0400
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-07-19 08:43 +0100
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-07-19 11:13 -0400
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-19 22:47 +0200
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-07-22 18:01 +0100
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2026-07-19 07:40 +0000
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-07-19 10:22 -0400
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-20 00:59 -0700
Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-07-19 13:25 -0400
csiph-web