Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #343834

Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code

From DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code
Date 2016-02-17 20:38 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <na3755$u8o$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <na0c59025os@news7.newsguy.com> <na0feb$8ob$3@dont-email.me> <na0hsp028cn@news6.newsguy.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2/16/2016 8:20 PM, Fabian Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:41:19 -0500, DFS wrote:
>
>>
>> Do you give your work away for free?
>>
>
> As a matter of fact I fscking do.
>
> As a research scientist

Bullshit.  You're an unemployed programmer who couldn't make it as a 
.NET developer.




> with three peer-reviewed publications,

By hobbyists, for hobbyists.



> I release the fruits of my labor free of charge to the world.

I can only imagine what kind of idiocy you "published".



> The goal of science is to improve civilization for the benefit
> of all,

A tiny few might be driven by altruism, but the vast majority just want 
to pay the bills.  If they can find a job in an interesting area of 
research that excites them, they're lucky.


> and such goals cannot be met through secretive hording.
>
> Open Source software has identical ambitions.  GNU/Linux is
> open and free for the betterment of mankind.


More bullshit.  It's open and free because some people like to code.

"Abstract:
In this paper we report on the results of a study of the effort and 
motivations of individuals to contributing to the creation of Free/Open 
Source software. We used a Web -based survey, administered to 684 
software developers in 287 F/OSS projects, to learn what lies behind the
effort put into such projects. Academic theorizing on individual 
motivations for participating in F/OSS projects has posited that 
external motivational factors in the form of extrinsic benefits
(e.g.; better jobs, career advancement) are the main drivers of effort. 
We find in contrast, that enjoyment-based intrinsic motivation, namely 
how creative a person feels when working on the project, is the 
strongest and most pervasive driver. We also find that user need, 
intellectual stimulation derived from writing code, and improving 
programming skills are top motivators for project participation. A 
majority of our respondents are skilled and experienced professionals
working in IT-related jobs, with approximately 40 percent being paid to 
participate in the F/OSS project."

http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/sloan-school-of-management/15-352-managing-innovation-emerging-trends-spring-2005/readings/lakhaniwolf.pdf



> MSFT is closed
> and protected to reap a short-term profit for a tiny clique
> of short-sighted shareholders.

25+ years of near total PC OS dominance isn't "short-term", bozo.



> You can take your fscking bourgeoisie idealism and cram
> it into your favorite orifice.

You can take your /fucking/ lies and idiocy and cram them into your 
favorite orifice: your drooling piehole.



Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-16 23:42 +0000
  Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-16 19:41 -0500
    Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:59 +0000
      Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-17 20:40 -0500
        Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-18 01:59 +0000
          Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-17 23:40 -0500
    Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-17 01:20 +0000
      Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-02-17 12:38 +0000
        Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:52 -0800
        Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-17 22:57 +0000
      Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-17 20:38 -0500
        Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-18 10:31 +0000
          Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-19 09:26 -0500
            Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-19 11:29 -0500

csiph-web