Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #343840

Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code
Date	2016-02-18 01:59 +0000
Organization	O.W.L.
Message-ID	<ngjd003a.wap3@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References	<na0c59025os@news7.newsguy.com> <na0feb$8ob$3@dont-email.me> <fhug98d02.a0p@rooftop.invalid> <na378m$u8o$5@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 2/16/2016 7:59 PM, owl wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 2/16/2016 6:42 PM, Fabian Russell wrote:
>>>> Microsoft Windows is so fscking wishy-washy in a number of ways.
>>>> But the pinnacle of MSFT asininity is that it distributes most
>>>> executables as byte code (or MSIL for Microsoft Intermediate
>>>> Language).
>>>>
>>>> Only after a program is loaded does it get translated into the
>>>> appropriate machine language (JIT), and the process is done piece
>>>> by fscking piece with many palpable lags.
>>>
>>>
>>> Which lags are you referring to?
>>>
>>> Win8 and later are very fast OSes.
>>>
>>
>> Fastest unwanted OSes ever.
> 
> Win10: 11.85% user share after 6 months,

after 6 months of doing everything in their power to force
it down everybody's throats.  Nobody wants it.  They are
happy with the OS that came with the machine they bought.
People just want to be left alone.

> free of cost to many
> Linux:  1.71% user share after 20 years,

after 20 years of being pre-installed practically nowhere.

Thread

Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-16 23:42 +0000
  Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-16 19:41 -0500
    Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:59 +0000
      Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-17 20:40 -0500
        Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-18 01:59 +0000
          Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-17 23:40 -0500
    Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-17 01:20 +0000
      Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-02-17 12:38 +0000
        Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:52 -0800
        Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-17 22:57 +0000
      Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-17 20:38 -0500
        Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-18 10:31 +0000
          Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-19 09:26 -0500
            Re: Linux Compile; Windows Byte Code "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-19 11:29 -0500

csiph-web