Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376139
| From | Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? |
| Date | 2016-02-12 22:15 +0000 |
| Organization | CÉIBHFHIONN |
| Message-ID | <n9llhp$fkl$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <66595307-4ce3-495d-a4ba-4527bdbd3592@googlegroups.com> <DIqvy.24089$SO7.6159@fx13.iad> <n9ljts$c8e$1@gioia.aioe.org> <5b51dd48-2d2d-48fe-8829-30d2c642562e@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato wrote: >> > You are right Herb. There are no gravity waves. Just galactic noise. >> >> Even more, the truck is NOT repeatable, reproducible, and no faulty >> connected cables are to be found, my adorable friend benj. >> >> Also, the shifted that signal at least an octave up, since 100,30,60 >> and 180 Hz sounds essentially like a fart. No joke. They fake the sound >> to the spectators, the audience and the entire free world. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_582rU6neLc >> I must insist, that sound is fake, is not the data. > > The data are the frequencies,not at all any waving media used to > transmit the information to us. RVHG (Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato) Well, you are wrong. The Earth surface is exactly the transducer, a gravity wave signal needs to be detected by. In principle nothing wrong in it. If and only if those Gravity Waves are real. But spacetime and vacuum has no structure, my lovely friend. No crystal structure. Hence a gravity wave modifying it, by "under-pressure" and "over-pressure" makes no sense. To do that you need an Aether. If what they detected is a wave of gravitation, then what they actually did is to prove the Aether.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-12 21:47 +0000
Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-12 22:00 +0000
Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:05 -0800
Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-12 22:15 +0000
Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-14 19:51 -0800
Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-14 20:25 -0800
Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-14 20:47 -0800
csiph-web