Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #552612
| From | Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? |
| Date | 2016-02-12 21:47 +0000 |
| Organization | CÉIBHFHIONN |
| Message-ID | <n9ljts$c8e$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <66595307-4ce3-495d-a4ba-4527bdbd3592@googlegroups.com> <DIqvy.24089$SO7.6159@fx13.iad> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
benj wrote: > On 02/12/2016 02:01 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote: >> Is it possible LIGO is so sensitive that it will pick up every type of >> waves in space that makes it useless? I think this could be part of >> its problem in the end.Think about it. Trebert >> > You are right Herb. There are no gravity waves. Just galactic noise. Even more, the truck is NOT repeatable, reproducible, and no faulty connected cables are to be found, my adorable friend benj. Also, the shifted that signal at least an octave up, since 100,30,60 and 180 Hz sounds essentially like a fart. No joke. They fake the sound to the spectators, the audience and the entire free world. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_582rU6neLc I must insist, that sound is fake, is not the data.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
LIGO Possibility ?????? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 11:01 -0800
LIGO Possibility ?????? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 11:14 -0800
Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-12 19:33 +0000
Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 00:21 -0500
Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:50 -0500
Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-12 21:47 +0000
Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-12 22:00 +0000
Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-12 22:15 +0000
Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-12 13:51 -0800
csiph-web