Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #552585

Re: LIGO Possibility ??????

Show all headers | View raw

HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
> You know, I was going to write a lengthy post about how ligo actually works and then decided to say fuck it. If you don't know how it works, you obviously have minimal science and physics education, so what's the point?
> 
> Suffice it to say that ligo is designed to debunk itself.
> 
> The odds on it getting a false reading are less than 3%.
> 
> Kooks are so tied to their kooky worldview that they cannot and will not ever accept gravitational waves. Their entire kooky 'physics'
> would fall apart. Not that it was tightly wrapped to begin with.
> 
> What branch of the service were you in BJ?
> 
> Lol

His Vietnam service was as one of Jane Fonda's baggage handlers.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

LIGO Possibility ?????? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 11:01 -0800
  LIGO Possibility ?????? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 11:14 -0800
    Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-12 19:33 +0000
    Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 00:21 -0500
  Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:50 -0500
    Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-12 21:47 +0000
      Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-12 22:00 +0000
      Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-12 22:15 +0000
  Re: LIGO Possibility ?????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-12 13:51 -0800

csiph-web