Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #375777
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? |
| Date | 2016-02-08 08:59 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <n9aafu$1nhs$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <defa1444-90c2-40d1-b2fc-d1c18ba45b0b@googlegroups.com> <e428278d-e602-4db0-b712-bbd6513bf175@googlegroups.com> |
On 2/6/2016 6:15 PM, Ross A. Finlayson wrote: > As scientists for the common good > the point is to discover new physics, > and: provide the necessary apologetics > that explain not_that_ physics was > wrong, but_why_ it was wrong, or what > re-interpretation provides further more > compelling truth for the matter, to > convince other scientists what is > right, not what is wrong. There is no need to explain why previous physics is wrong, other than to point to the experimental evidence that shows it is wrong. Likewise, there is no argument needed to justify new physics, other than to point to its improved consistency with experimental evidence. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-06 15:55 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 16:15 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-06 16:33 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 22:43 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? erkdemon@gmail.com - 2016-02-07 19:53 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 21:57 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:14 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 22:50 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 23:41 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 00:28 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 01:11 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 08:59 -0600
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? erkdemon@gmail.com - 2016-02-08 17:21 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? xxein1@att.net - 2016-02-11 15:06 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 20:02 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 20:10 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 23:55 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-14 12:33 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? brightontoyandmodelmuseum@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 16:42 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-02-15 22:21 -0600
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-09 02:40 +0100
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:57 -0600
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:44 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 11:27 -0600
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:50 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 12:03 -0600
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 11:11 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 13:33 -0600
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 11:49 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-09 20:55 +0100
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 14:46 -0600
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 13:51 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 17:03 -0600
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-09 20:19 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 21:42 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:17 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:28 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:39 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-10 09:36 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 09:59 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-10 10:29 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 10:44 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:52 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:39 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 14:53 -0600
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 14:06 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 11:05 -0600
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 09:25 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 20:11 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 21:05 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 01:20 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-20 23:22 +0100
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 14:42 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? brightontoyandmodelmuseum@gmail.com - 2016-02-26 15:26 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? erkdemon@gmail.com - 2016-02-26 15:32 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 19:29 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Eric Baird <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 21:14 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 21:51 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-09 19:04 +0100
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 10:30 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-09 19:31 +0100
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 10:38 -0800
Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-09 20:57 +0100
csiph-web