Re: SYNONYM question

From	Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: SYNONYM question
Date	2016-02-03 20:52 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<n8tp4j$4tk$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<n8ssmo$aaa$1@dont-email.me> <2016Feb3.161644@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <n8tgik$thq$1@dont-email.me> <56b25e6b$0$23777$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>

Show all headers | View raw

On 03/02/2016 20:09, Albert van der Horst wrote:
> Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> writes:
>
>> - obtaining the nt of a synonym shoulds give the same nt as the
>> original. IIRC the only standard way to obtain an nt is using
>> TRAVERSE-WORDLIST and providing a word that does a string comparison, in
>> which case the nt's are likely to be different?
>
> This serves to show that nt (name token) is a bad name.
> I'm a proponent of dea (dictionary entry address).
>
> Name token suggest that the name identifies the entry.
> By definition this makes it impossible to make entries the same
> and have the name different.

If a system has headers separated from the body and the synonym headers 
point to the same body, if the name token points to the header (isn't 
that the same as your dea?) they will have different name tokens but 
with the same body.

-- 
Gerry

Thread

SYNONYM question Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2016-02-03 12:47 +0000
  Re: SYNONYM question Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 05:36 -0800
    Re: SYNONYM question stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2016-02-03 15:36 +0000
      Re: SYNONYM question Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2016-02-03 17:26 +0000
        Re: SYNONYM question Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2016-02-27 00:07 +0000
        Re: SYNONYM question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-02-26 18:44 -0800
      Re: SYNONYM question Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 02:17 -0800
        Re: SYNONYM question Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-02-04 11:32 +0000
          Re: SYNONYM question stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2016-02-04 17:12 +0000
      Re: SYNONYM question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-02-08 22:03 -0800
        Re: SYNONYM question Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2016-03-03 00:09 +0000
          Re: SYNONYM question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-03-02 22:02 -0800
  Re: SYNONYM question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-02-03 15:16 +0000
    Re: SYNONYM question Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2016-02-03 18:26 +0000
      Re: SYNONYM question Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-02-03 20:09 +0000
        Re: SYNONYM question Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2016-02-03 20:52 +0000
          Re: SYNONYM question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-02-03 15:59 -1000
          Re: SYNONYM question Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-02-04 11:25 +0000
      Re: SYNONYM question Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 02:16 -0800
        Re: SYNONYM question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-02-04 11:18 +0000
      Re: SYNONYM question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-02-04 10:54 +0000
        Re: SYNONYM question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-02-04 23:35 +1100
  Re: SYNONYM question Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-02-03 19:48 +0000
    Re: SYNONYM question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-02-04 11:07 +1100
    Re: SYNONYM question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-02-04 11:08 +0000

csiph-web