Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #45301
| From | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: SYNONYM question |
| Date | 2016-02-04 11:18 +0000 |
| Organization | Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien |
| Message-ID | <2016Feb4.121848@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink) |
| References | <n8ssmo$aaa$1@dont-email.me> <2016Feb3.161644@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <n8tgik$thq$1@dont-email.me> <f312964a-8516-4f2d-9524-547dc09069fc@googlegroups.com> |
Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> writes:
>I'd take issue with that. A name token should return the name token of
>the word, not it's "parent". There may be times when you want to display
>the name of the word (step by step debuggers etc).
>
>Agree re the XT.
Debuggers and decompilers usually don't have the nt available; in
indirect=-threaded code, they have the CFA, which is probably used as
xt, so if the synonym has the same xt, the decompiler/debugger will
decompile the same name. Which is not a problem, because decompilers
(and debuggers) are a best-effort issue anyway, and programmers tend
to accept this (e.g., native-code compilers typically show assembly
code as output of SEE).
- anton
--
M. Anton Ertl http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
EuroForth 2015: http://www.rigwit.co.uk/EuroForth2015/
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
SYNONYM question Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2016-02-03 12:47 +0000
Re: SYNONYM question Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 05:36 -0800
Re: SYNONYM question stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2016-02-03 15:36 +0000
Re: SYNONYM question Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2016-02-03 17:26 +0000
Re: SYNONYM question Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2016-02-27 00:07 +0000
Re: SYNONYM question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-02-26 18:44 -0800
Re: SYNONYM question Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 02:17 -0800
Re: SYNONYM question Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-02-04 11:32 +0000
Re: SYNONYM question stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2016-02-04 17:12 +0000
Re: SYNONYM question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-02-08 22:03 -0800
Re: SYNONYM question Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2016-03-03 00:09 +0000
Re: SYNONYM question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-03-02 22:02 -0800
Re: SYNONYM question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-02-03 15:16 +0000
Re: SYNONYM question Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2016-02-03 18:26 +0000
Re: SYNONYM question Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-02-03 20:09 +0000
Re: SYNONYM question Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2016-02-03 20:52 +0000
Re: SYNONYM question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-02-03 15:59 -1000
Re: SYNONYM question Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-02-04 11:25 +0000
Re: SYNONYM question Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 02:16 -0800
Re: SYNONYM question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-02-04 11:18 +0000
Re: SYNONYM question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-02-04 10:54 +0000
Re: SYNONYM question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-02-04 23:35 +1100
Re: SYNONYM question Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-02-03 19:48 +0000
Re: SYNONYM question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-02-04 11:07 +1100
Re: SYNONYM question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-02-04 11:08 +0000
csiph-web