Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #549411
| From | Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Hey Odd! |
| Date | 2016-01-30 18:49 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <n8j0j50i49@news6.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <n8fqds$oms$1@gioia.aioe.org> <n8g8in02emf@news4.newsguy.com> <7tOqy.216391$Gc6.104488@fx08.iad> <n8gpi842h9j@news6.newsguy.com> <ag_qy.238688$8V1.13638@fx28.iad> |
On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 03:12:54 -0500, benj wrote: > > Sure "properly managed" not only means multiple copies but regularly > re-writing onto the current "in" media. In other words a lifetime of > constant attention > Several terabytes, which is all a large e-book collection would require, does not necessitate "a lifetime of constant attention." A few hours, or at most a few part-time days, every few years is all it takes. > > Go to any large dead tree library and you can easily access books from > several centuries ago. More in some cases. > Unless those books have been printed on acid-free paper, they will inevitable deteriorate. A hundred-year-old book usually has very brittle pages that will fragment into pieces when handled. Indeed, what is primarily responsible for preserving those books is the total lack of handling which they experience. In most cases common books will deteriorate much sooner than a century. This is very true for cheap paperbacks, and many worthwhile titles are available only in that format. (I collect books on American serial killers which, because of the sordid nature of the subject, are published only as paperbacks.) I have some cheap paperbacks, only a few years old, that are already yellow and brittle. My plan is to cut these up to scan the pages followed by an OCR to convert to digital text. In this way these priceless (for me) paperbacks will be available much longer. > > the "best" system is multiple servers which form mirrors > of each other configured with RAID drives. And protected by UPS systems. > This certainly is not practical for the home e-book library. > > A bookshelf is virtually > maintenance free so long as it's in a reasonable living environment. > Sure. Like the Taj Mahal Storage hardware will inevitable improve. SSDs are common and they do not involve the spinning rust platters. SSDs currently have many shortcomings for long-term storage but eventually the technology should reach a point where one can write and store in an error-free mode forever.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Hey Odd! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 17:31 -0500
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 16:35 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 17:47 -0500
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 17:12 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 17:16 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 16:14 -0800
Re: Hey Odd! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 20:05 -0500
Re: Hey Odd! kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-29 12:34 -0800
Re: Hey Odd! Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 13:36 -0800
Re: Hey Odd! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 19:55 -0500
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 07:45 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 12:29 -0500
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-29 17:47 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 12:19 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-29 18:43 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 19:17 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-29 21:59 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 16:37 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 22:40 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-29 23:38 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:19 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:27 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-29 22:11 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 16:44 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 02:33 -0500
Re: Hey Odd! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 22:53 -0800
Re: Hey Odd! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-29 12:25 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-29 18:38 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:23 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-29 22:20 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 16:52 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-29 23:54 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 12:29 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-30 20:43 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 00:07 -0500
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-31 05:17 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 01:39 -0500
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:25 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 12:29 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-30 20:51 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 00:16 -0500
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-31 05:58 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:29 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-30 21:08 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:33 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-31 20:20 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 14:48 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-31 21:37 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 16:00 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 16:02 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-01 00:03 -0800
Re: Hey Odd! The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-01 00:36 -0800
Re: Hey Odd! The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-01 14:18 -0800
Re: Hey Odd! The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-01 16:16 -0800
Re: Hey Odd! HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 10:41 -0800
Re: Hey Odd! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:22 -0500
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-29 22:26 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 16:59 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-29 23:45 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:19 -0600
Re: Hey Odd! Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 14:55 -0800
Re: Hey Odd! Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 10:55 -0800
Re: Hey Odd! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 13:47 -0500
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-29 22:36 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:12 -0500
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-30 18:49 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 23:52 -0500
Re: Hey Odd! Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-01-31 05:47 +0000
Re: Hey Odd! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 02:05 -0500
csiph-web